Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Classification and Identification

Methods of Classification and Identification

Bacterial identification relies on a diverse array of techniques to classify and understand microorganisms, each tailored to uncover specific characteristics. Traditional morphological approaches, while still valuable, are limited for closely related or structurally simple organisms. Modern methods integrate biochemical, serological, genetic, and advanced molecular tools to achieve greater accuracy.Morphological and Biochemical TechniquesMorphological characteristics, such as cell shape and...

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparative transcriptomics of biopesticide-treated olives subjected to Xylella infection.

BMC plant biology·2026

Same author

<i>'Candidatus</i> Phytoplasma periplocae' sp. nov. associated with <i>Periploca aphylla</i> witches' broom disease.

International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology·2026

Same author

Interkingdom signaling dynamics in the cereal holobiont: microbiome-mediated pathways to drought resilience.

Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB·2026

Same author

Ciprofloxacin-Based Ionic Liquids Increase Mutation Frequency in <i>Escherichia coli</i>.

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

On the genetic origins of phenotypes in genome-wide association studies: the SAFE-h<sup>2</sup> tool for exploring additive and non-additive allelic effects.

BMC bioinformatics·2026

Same author

Resistance to clinically important antibiotics and reduced susceptibility to disinfectants in the pandemic ST398 methicillin-susceptible <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> from Austria.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Application of DNA Barcoding to Identify Medicinal Plants

Application of DNA Barcoding to Identify Medicinal Plants

Published on: November 1, 2024

DNA bar-coding for phytoplasma identification.

Olga Makarova¹, Nicoletta Contaldo, Samanta Paltrinieri

¹Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)

|September 19, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new DNA barcoding tool aids phytoplasma identification by analyzing tuf and 16SrRNA genes. This method enables simultaneous identification of diverse phytoplasma groups, overcoming previous limitations.

More Related Videos

BEST: Barcode Enabled Sequencing of Tetrads

BEST: Barcode Enabled Sequencing of Tetrads

Published on: May 1, 2014

Field Identification of Matricaria chamomilla using a Portable qPCR System

Field Identification of Matricaria chamomilla using a Portable qPCR System

Published on: October 10, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Application of DNA Barcoding to Identify Medicinal Plants

Application of DNA Barcoding to Identify Medicinal Plants

Published on: November 1, 2024

BEST: Barcode Enabled Sequencing of Tetrads

BEST: Barcode Enabled Sequencing of Tetrads

Published on: May 1, 2014

Field Identification of Matricaria chamomilla using a Portable qPCR System

Field Identification of Matricaria chamomilla using a Portable qPCR System

Published on: October 10, 2020

Area of Science:

Plant pathology
Molecular biology
Microbial genomics

Background:

Phytoplasmas are difficult to identify due to their inability to be cultured in vitro.
Existing sequence-based methods often struggle with simultaneous identification of diverse phytoplasma groups.
DNA barcoding offers a standardized approach for microbial identification using genetic markers.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a DNA barcoding tool for efficient and simultaneous identification of phytoplasmas.
To address the limitations of current methods in distinguishing between various phytoplasma groups.
To provide a reliable protocol for phytoplasma identification applicable to multiple phylogenetic clades.

Main Methods:

Development of a DNA barcoding protocol targeting the tuf and 16SrRNA genes.
Utilizing a database for comparison of short DNA sequences for identification.
Application of the protocol to identify phytoplasmas from multiple 16Sr groups.

Main Results:

The developed DNA barcoding protocol successfully identifies phytoplasmas from numerous groups (16SrI-XII, XV, XX, XXI).
This method allows for the simultaneous identification of phytoplasmas from different phylogenetic clades.
The protocol overcomes the limitations of previous methods that were specific to particular strains or groups.

Conclusions:

The tuf and 16SrRNA gene-based DNA barcoding protocol is effective for broad-range phytoplasma identification.
This tool provides a significant advancement for phytoplasma diagnostics and research.
The method facilitates accurate and simultaneous classification of diverse phytoplasma strains.