Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comodulation detection differences with multiple signal bands.

B A Wright1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin 78712.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning two things at once: differential constraints on the acquisition and consolidation of perceptual learning.

Neuroscience·2009
Same author

Why and how we study human learning on basic auditory tasks.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2001
Same author

Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2001
Same author

Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2001
Same author

Age-related improvements in auditory backward and simultaneous masking in 6- to 10-year-old children.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2001
Same author

Thinner females and heavier males: who says? A comparison of female to male ideal body sizes across a wide age span.

The International journal of eating disorders·2001
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Auditory perception of multi-band signals depends on temporal envelope patterns. Performance was best when signal bands differed in envelope from cue bands, aiding sound detection.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Understanding auditory perception of complex sounds is crucial for hearing research.
  • Temporal envelope processing plays a key role in distinguishing auditory signals.
  • Previous studies explored detection of simple tones in noise.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of temporal envelope patterns on the detection of multi-band auditory signals.
  • To determine how signal and cue band temporal envelopes affect auditory detection thresholds.
  • To compare the fit of independent-threshold and statistical-summation models to multi-band signal detection data.

Main Methods:

  • Determined detection thresholds for signals composed of one, two, or five noise bands (100 Hz wide).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Embedded signals within eight 'cue' bands across various center frequencies (signal: 1250-3250 Hz; cue: 500-4000 Hz).
  • Manipulated temporal envelope patterns (same vs. different) for signal and cue bands across listening conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Auditory detection performance was optimal when signal bands had different temporal envelopes than the cue bands.
    • Performance degraded when cue bands shared different envelopes or when signal and cue bands shared the same envelope.
    • Multi-band signal thresholds were better explained by an independent-thresholds model than a statistical-summation model, though neither model fit all conditions perfectly.

    Conclusions:

    • Temporal envelope congruity between signal and cue bands significantly impacts auditory detection.
    • Findings support the role of both within-channel and across-channel processing in complex auditory perception.
    • The independent-thresholds model offers a better, but not complete, explanation for multi-band signal detection.