Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
Arsenic, chromium and mercury removal using mussel shell ash or a sludge/ashes waste mixture
Natalia Seco-Reigosa1, Susana Peña-Rodríguez, Juan Carlos Nóvoa-Muñoz
1Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola, Escola Politécnica Superior, University of Santiago de Compostela, Campus univ. s/n, 27002 Lugo, Spain.
Abstract:
Different batches of valued mussel shell and waste mussel shell ash are characterised. Shell ash has pH > 12 and high electrical conductivities (between 16.01 and 27.27 dS m(-1)), while calcined shell shows pH values up to 10.7 and electrical conductivities between 1.19 and 3.55 dS m(-1). X-ray fluorescence, nitric acid digestion and water extractions show higher concentrations in shell ash for most parameters. Calcite is the dominant crystalline compound in this ash (95.6%), followed by aragonite. Adsorption/desorption trials were performed for mussel shell ash and for a waste mixture including shell ash, sewage sludge and wood ash, showing the following percentage adsorptions: Hg(II) >94%, As(V) >96% and Cr(VI) between 11 and 30% for shell ash; Hg(II) >98%, As(V) >88% and Cr(VI) between 30 and 88% for the waste mixture. Hg and As desorption was <5% for both shell ash and the waste mixture, while Cr desorption was between 92 and 45% for shell ash, and between 19 and 0% for the mixture. In view of that, mussel shell ash and the mixture including shell ash, sewage sludge and wood ash could be useful for Hg(II) and As(V) removal.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...
Microbial Leaching
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Acid Mine Drainage
Factors Affecting Solubility
Bioremediation

