Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models
Published on: July 21, 2023
A comparison of criterion standard methods to diagnose acute heart failure
Sean P Collins1, Christopher J Lindsell, Donald M Yealy
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. sean.collins@vanderbilt.edu
Insights
Diagnosing acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) in the emergency department (ED) can vary. Different diagnostic standards show good agreement but identify different patient groups, impacting research.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) require accurate and consistent diagnosis in emergency settings.
- Current diagnostic criterion standards in emergency departments (EDs) for AHFS lack standardized comparison.
- Variability in diagnostic criteria may affect patient identification and subsequent management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare and contrast the clinical criterion standards used for diagnosing AHFS in emergency department patients.
- To assess the agreement between different diagnostic standards for AHFS.
- To inform researchers on the implications of choosing specific criterion standards for evaluating new diagnostic tests.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study involving 483 patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of AHFS.
- Three criterion standards were evaluated: ED physician diagnosis, hospital discharge diagnosis, and expert cardiologist review.
- Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient was used to assess inter-rater agreement between the diagnostic standards.
Main Results:
- All criterion standards showed good agreement (κ values ranging from 0.59 to 0.74).
- Patients diagnosed with AHFS consistently presented with a history of AHFS, physical examination findings of congestion, chest radiography findings, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels.
- While sensitivity was similar across standards, specificities differed, indicating that each method identifies distinct patient populations.
Conclusions:
- The choice of criterion standard significantly influences patient selection in AHFS diagnosis.
- Researchers must carefully consider the implications of different criterion standards when developing or validating new diagnostic tests for AHFS.
- Further research may be needed to establish a gold standard for AHFS diagnosis in the ED setting.
Abstract:
The authors sought to compare and contrast the clinical criterion standards currently used in a cohort of emergency department (ED) patients to diagnose acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS). In a prospective observational study of patients with signs and symptoms of AHFS, 3 criterion standards were examined: (1) the treating ED physician's diagnosis; (2) the hospital discharge diagnosis; and (3) a diagnosis based on medical record review by a panel of cardiologists. Using Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient, the authors assessed agreement and then compared the different standards by repeatedly setting one as the criterion standard and the other two as index tests. A total of 483 patients were enrolled. Across all criterion standards, patients with AHFS were more likely to have a history of AHFS, congestion on physical examination and chest radiography, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels than those without AHFS. The standards agreed well (cardiology review vs hospital discharge diagnosis, κ=0.74; cardiology review vs ED diagnosis, κ=0.66; ED diagnosis vs hospital discharge diagnosis κ=0.59). Each method had similar sensitivity but differing specificities. Different criterion standards identify different patients from among those being evaluated for AHFS. Researchers should consider this when choosing between the various criterion standard approaches when evaluating new index tests.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure