Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

Confidence Intervals

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Animal responses to herbage allowance: Forage intake and body weight gain of sheep grazing the Inner Mongolian steppe - Results of a six-year study.

Journal of animal science·2016

Same author

Simultaneous inference of a binary composite endpoint and its components.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2016

Same author

Insight into the beneficial immunomodulatory mechanism of the sevoflurane metabolite hexafluoro-2-propanol in a rat model of endotoxaemia.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2015

Same author

A critical appraisal of analyzing nasal provocation test results in allergen immunotherapy trials.

Rhinology·2014

Same author

The effect of knee brace and knee sleeve on the proprioception of the knee in young non-professional healthy sportsmen.

The Knee·2013

Same author

Analytical method transfer: improving interpretability with ratio-based statistical approaches.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis·2012

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Simultaneous confidence intervals on multivariate non-inferiority.

M Hasler¹, L A Hothorn

¹Lehrfach Variationsstatistik, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Germany. hasler@email.uni-kiel.de

Statistics in Medicine

|September 22, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores non-inferiority trials with multiple endpoints, presenting methods for analyzing various scenarios. The research focuses on estimating confidence limits for practical interpretation of non-inferiority in complex trial designs.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trial Design
Pharmaceutical Research

Background:

Non-inferiority trials are crucial for demonstrating that a new treatment is not unacceptably worse than a standard one.
Multi-armed designs with multiple correlated endpoints present unique analytical challenges.
Establishing non-inferiority thresholds for diverse endpoints is often impractical.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and compare analytical approaches for non-inferiority trials with multi-armed designs and multiple correlated endpoints.
To address five distinct non-inferiority scenarios: global, subset, treatment group, endpoint-specific, and local.
To provide methods for estimating simultaneous confidence limits and interpreting non-inferiority post hoc.

Main Methods:

Utilizing union-intersection and intersection-union test principles, individually and in combination.
Focusing on the estimation of simultaneous confidence limits for multiple endpoints.
Applying methods to a real-world data example to illustrate practical application.

Main Results:

Comparison of different analytical approaches for various non-inferiority scenarios.
Demonstration of the utility of simultaneous confidence limits for post hoc interpretation.
Highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the discussed methods through a case study.

Conclusions:

The proposed methods offer a flexible framework for analyzing complex non-inferiority trials.
Simultaneous confidence limits are valuable for interpreting non-inferiority across multiple correlated endpoints.
The study provides practical insights for biostatisticians and researchers involved in clinical trial analysis.