Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Using Little's Irregularity Index in orthodontics: outdated and inaccurate?
Donal Macauley1, Thérèse M Garvey, Adam H Dowling
1Orthodontics Unit, Division of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental University Hospital, School of Dental Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Little's Irregularity Index (LII) shows poor reproducibility for assessing orthodontic treatment outcomes. Individual measurements are imprecise, making LII unreliable for evaluating brackets, retainers, or treatment modalities in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental Measurement Techniques
- Epidemiological Tools
Background:
- Little's Irregularity Index (LII) is used for assessing incisor alignment and orthodontic treatment efficacy.
- Its application has expanded to evaluate orthodontic materials and treatment modalities.
- The reliability of LII measurements in clinical settings requires thorough investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the repeatability and precision of Little's Irregularity Index (LII) measurements.
- To assess the performance of four independent examiners on maxillary arch dental casts.
- To test the hypothesis that individual contact point displacement measurements for LII are not reproducible.
Main Methods:
- Ten maxillary dental casts were used for the study.
- Four examiners assessed anterior contact point displacements of the six anterior teeth.
- Measurements were taken three times for each cast using the LII method.
Main Results:
- Significant correlations were found between examiner pairs for displacements over 0.5 mm (r > 0.413; p < 0.001).
- Over 20% variation from the mean was observed in 516 out of 600 individual measurements (86%).
- Significant differences between examiners were noted in 46% of contact point displacement measurements (p < 0.047).
Conclusions:
- The reproducibility of individual contact point displacement measurements for LII is poor.
- LII is not a reliable tool for assessing orthodontic brackets, retainers, or treatment modalities.
- The use of LII in clinical practice for predicting treatment outcomes is not advocated due to limited accuracy and precision.
Related Concept Videos
Law of Rational Indices
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first column of the Routh...

