Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Nerve Excitability Assessment in Chemotherapy-induced Neurotoxicity
Published on: April 26, 2012
Endpoints for clinical trials and revised assessment in neuro-oncology
Nicholas Butowski1, Susan M Chang
1Division of Neuro- Oncology, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0350, USA. butowski@neurosurg.ucsf.edu
Purpose Of Review:
Recent advances in survival for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent brain tumors, combined with the development of an ever-increasing number of potential treatments, has led to significant growth in the number of clinical trials for patients with brain tumors. Suitable clinical trial design and endpoints are vital for successfully evaluating these new treatments that may continue to improve outcome. However, inadequacies of clinical trial endpoints have challenged how best to evaluate promising new therapeutics.
Recent Findings:
Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse confound imaging-based endpoints, including overall radiographic response and progression-free survival. Overall survival is still regarded as the definitive endpoint, but recently identified active salvage agents such as bevacizumab may diminish the association between presalvage therapy and overall survival, making interpretation of clinical trial results difficult. Novel imaging and the assessment of patient function, quality of life (QOL), and cognition are more frequently employed as endpoints.
Summary:
An awareness of the benefits and imperfections of clinical trial endpoints will lead to improved clinical trial design and results. Validated endpoints of patient function, QOL, and cognition are available and increasingly valued as secondary endpoints.
Insights
Evaluating new brain tumor treatments requires effective clinical trial endpoints. Current imaging endpoints are limited, necessitating a focus on patient function, quality of life, and cognition for improved trial design and outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Clinical trial design
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Advances in brain tumor survival and treatment development have increased clinical trials.
- Evaluating new therapeutics requires robust clinical trial endpoints.
- Existing endpoints face challenges in accurately assessing treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the challenges and advancements in clinical trial endpoints for brain tumors.
- To highlight the limitations of current imaging-based endpoints.
- To emphasize the growing importance of patient-centered outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature on brain tumor clinical trial endpoints.
- Analysis of the impact of pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse on imaging endpoints.
- Discussion of novel endpoints including imaging, function, quality of life, and cognition.
Main Results:
- Imaging endpoints like radiographic response and progression-free survival are confounded by pseudoprogression/pseudoresponse.
- Overall survival interpretation is complicated by salvage therapies (e.g., bevacizumab).
- Novel imaging, patient function, quality of life (QOL), and cognition are increasingly used as endpoints.
Conclusions:
- Understanding endpoint benefits and limitations is key to improving clinical trial design.
- Validated endpoints for patient function, QOL, and cognition are valuable secondary endpoints.
- Improved endpoints will lead to more accurate evaluation of novel brain tumor therapeutics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...

