Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation01:10

Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation

Signal processing techniques are essential for accurately converting continuous signals to digital formats and vice versa. When a continuous signal is sampled with a period T, the resulting sampled signal exhibits replicas of the original spectrum in the frequency domain, spaced at intervals equal to the sampling frequency. To handle this sampled signal, a zero-order hold method can be applied, which creates a piecewise constant signal by retaining each sample's value until the next sampling...
Anatomy of the Ear01:16

Anatomy of the Ear

Auditory sensation, commonly called hearing, involves the transformation of sonic waves into neural impulses facilitated by the structures of the auditory organ. The prominent, flesh-like structure on the side of the head, called the auricle, directs sound waves towards the auditory canal. The auricle is often mislabeled as the pinna, a term more aligned with mobile structures like a feline's external ear. The auditory canal penetrates the cranium via the external auditory meatus of the...
Hearing01:31

Hearing

When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auditory detection of flowing water by humans in a natural habitat: Psychophysical and modelling dataa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Spectro-temporal modulation templates for human perception of animal vocalisations in natural soundscapesa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Modulation statistics of natural soundscapesa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Auditory discrimination and identification of time of day for natural soundscapesa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Auditory discrimination of diel variations for natural soundscapes: Role of spectral and temporal informationa).

JASA express letters·2025
Same author

Auditory perception of biodiversity by human listeners.

Frontiers in psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Christian Lorenzi1, Nicolas Wallaert, Dan Gnansia

  • 1Equipe Audition (CNRS, Universite Paris Descartes, Ecole normale superieure), Institut d'Etude de la Cognition, Ecole normale superieure, Paris Sciences et Lettres, 29 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. lorenzi@ens.fr

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO
|September 26, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Listeners with hearing loss struggle to reconstruct temporal-envelope information from frequency-modulation (FM) cues, but mild-to-moderate cochlear damage has a modest impact on this ability.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Speech Perception
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Normal-hearing listeners can use frequency-modulation (FM) cues to reconstruct amplitude-modulation (AM) information for speech intelligibility.
  • The impact of cochlear damage on this compensatory mechanism is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether cochlear damage impairs the ability to reconstruct temporal-envelope information from FM cues.
  • To quantify the effect of mild-to-moderate hearing loss on this auditory processing capacity.

Main Methods:

  • 40 normal-hearing and 41 hearing-impaired listeners identified syllables with degraded AM cues but intact FM cues.
  • Stimuli were presented at 65 dB SPL, with and without amplification for hearing-impaired listeners.
  • A simulation study was used to model the effects of cochlear filter broadening.

Main Results:

  • Hearing-impaired listeners performed significantly worse than normal-hearing listeners in identifying the syllables.
  • Amplification partially restored performance in hearing-impaired listeners, indicating a modest detrimental effect of hearing loss.
  • Simulation results suggested cochlear filter broadening by a factor of 2-4 in hearing-impaired listeners.

Conclusions:

  • Mild-to-moderate cochlear hearing loss has a modest detrimental effect on the peripheral reconstruction of temporal-envelope information from FM cues.
  • This suggests that the auditory system retains some capacity to compensate for degraded AM information even with cochlear damage.