Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does prostate-cancer treatment place a strain on the heart?

Nature·2022
Same author

Metastatic prostate cancer: seeking a fresh chance of recovery.

Nature·2022
Same author

Out of your skin.

Nature biotechnology·2020
Same author

Researchers Find Discrepancies in Gene Panel Tests for Cancer.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2018
Same author

M. D. Anderson Breaks With IBM Watson, Raising Questions About Artificial Intelligence in Oncology.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2018
Same author

New Guidelines Allow Some Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia To Go Off Treatment.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2018
Same journal

Response to Wang et al. and Shen et al.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Cluster randomized controlled trial of decision support for breast cancer chemoprevention, MiCHOICE.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Beyond R2: Assessing quality of trial level surrogate endpoints in colorectal cancer.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

A novel classification of small bowel adenocarcinoma based on the hidden genome classifier: a multi-institutional study.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Response to Yu, Wang and Ge.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same journal

Re: Cardiovascular disease risk after radiotherapy and anthracycline-based chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Uncertainty Over DAT Testing

Charlie Schmidt

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute
    |September 26, 2012
    PubMed
    Summary

    No abstract available in PubMed .

    More Related Videos

    Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
    08:06

    Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

    Published on: June 18, 2018

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 18, 2026

    Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
    09:07

    Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

    Published on: September 16, 2015

    Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
    08:06

    Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

    Published on: June 18, 2018