Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
The case for cognitive screening in HIV clinics
P McNamara1, J Redmond, C Bergin
1Department of Neurology, Hospital 5 HCC, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8. pmcnamara@stjames.ie
Insights
This study found that using surrogate markers identified cognitive impairment in 13.8% of HIV patients. These markers are less effective than structured screening for assessing cognitive function in people with HIV.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- Cognitive impairment is a concern in individuals with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
- Previous studies have explored various methods to assess cognitive function in this population.
- Surrogate markers offer a potential, albeit less precise, way to identify cognitive issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of cognitive impairment in an HIV-positive cohort using surrogate markers.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of surrogate markers compared to structured cognitive screening.
- To identify factors associated with cognitive impairment in HIV patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 500 consecutive HIV patients at St. James's Hospital, Dublin.
- Utilized surrogate markers including subjective complaints, new psychiatric diagnoses, neurological complications, and radiological atrophy.
- Employed multivariate logistic regression analysis to explore associations with demographic and clinical factors.
Main Results:
- 13.8% of patients (69/500) exhibited one or more positive surrogate markers for cognitive impairment.
- Significant associations were found with gender and year of HIV diagnosis.
- The prevalence identified by surrogate markers was lower than international rates, suggesting limited sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- Surrogate markers are insufficient for accurately determining the prevalence of cognitive impairment in HIV-positive individuals.
- Structured cognitive screening is a more reliable method for assessing cognitive function in this population.
- The study highlights the need for improved diagnostic tools and has initiated prospective screening.
Abstract:
A retrospective chart review was carried out at the HIV clinic in St. James's Hospital, Dublin to examine the rate of cognitive impairment through the use of surrogate markers for cognitive impairment. 500 consecutive hospital charts were reviewed. There were 306 men and 194 women. Median age was 37. The most common mode of transmission was heterosexual. 45% had a nadir CD4 < 200. 78.6% were on antiretroviral therapy and 72.26% were virally suppressed. 69/500 patients (13.8%) had one or more positive surrogate markers for cognitive impairment. The surrogate markers used were subjective complaints, a new onset of a psychiatric diagnosis post diagnosis with HIV, neurological complications and radiological evidence of atrophy. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression showed significant relationships only with gender and year of diagnosis. This figure is lower than reported international prevalence rates of cognitive impairment and demonstrates that surrogate markers are no match for structured cognitive screening. We have since commenced structured prospective screening to obtain a true prevalence of cognitive impairment in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Retrovirus Life Cycles
