Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
07:32

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Published on: February 23, 2024

Predicting third molar surgery operative time: a validated model.

Srinivas M Susarla1, Thomas B Dodson

  • 1Center for Applied Clinical Investigation, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02114, USA. SSUSARLA1@partners.org

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
|September 27, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

When Patients Are Subjects.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same author

Validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 Codes for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) Among Individuals Prescribed Antiresorptives for Fracture Prevention Across Two Cohorts.

Clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Discussion: Principles and Techniques to Reduce the Incidence of Fistula: A Review of over 1000 Cleft Palate Repairs by a Single Surgeon.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Are You Scared Yet?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same author

Reconstruction of Fistulas Following Cleft Palate Repair.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Orthognathic Surgery for Cleft-Related Maxillomandibular Discrepancies.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The 5 Ms Framework: An Opportunity to Mitigate the Risks of Prescription Opioids in Older Adults in Oral Maxillofacial Surgery.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Are Temporomandibular Disorders in Individuals With Intellectual Disability Overlooked?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Retraction notice to "Compared to intravenous injection of midazolam, does intranasal dexmedetomidine provide adequate sedation for dentoalveolar surgery?" [Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 84/5 (2026) 656-664].

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

RE: Do Cannabis Users Require More Anesthesia During Third Molar Removal Under Intravenous General Anesthesia When Compared to Nonusers?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

REPLY: Does Drug Type Influence Surgical Outcome in MRONJ? A Comparison Between Denosumab and Zoledronate.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
See all related articles

A new statistical model accurately predicts third molar (M3) extraction time. This model, based on factors like tooth location and surgical experience, helps estimate operative time for wisdom tooth removal procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dental Anesthesia
  • Predictive Analytics in Medicine

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of operative time is crucial for efficient dental surgical scheduling and resource management.
  • Third molar (M3) extractions are common procedures with variable durations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a statistical model for predicting third molar (M3) operative time.
  • To identify key demographic, anatomic, and operative variables influencing M3 extraction duration.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cohort study involving 150 subjects undergoing M3 removal.
  • Multiple linear regression analysis used to build a predictive model on an index sample (n=100).
  • Model validation performed on a separate, non-overlapping sample (n=50).

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
07:32

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Published on: February 23, 2024

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Main Results:

  • The developed model explained 58% of the variance in M3 extraction time (R2=0.58).
  • Key predictors included M3 location, Winter's classification, tooth morphology, number of teeth extracted, procedure type, and surgical experience.
  • The model showed no significant difference between predicted and observed extraction times in the validation sample (P=.16).

Conclusions:

  • A validated statistical model can reliably predict third molar (M3) operative time.
  • The model's coefficients demonstrated good agreement between the development and validation datasets.
  • This predictive tool can aid in surgical planning and improve efficiency in third molar extraction procedures.