Summary of in vitro genetic toxicology assay results: expected and unexpected effects of recent study design...

Key modifications to in vitro genetic toxicology testing have been made in the last 5 years including the use of optimization approaches such as structure-activity relationships and screening assays to identify and eliminate potentially genotoxic chemicals from further consideration, better guidance on cytotoxicity assessment and dose selection, and greater use of p53-competent human cells. To determine the effect of these changes on testing outcomes, the pattern of positive results across assays conducted by BioReliance from 2005 to 2010 was examined. Data were tabulated for good laboratory practice (GLP)-compliant Ames, mouse lymphoma (MLA), chromosome aberration in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, and in human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL) assays along with non-GLP screening Ames assays. A decrease in percentage of positive results in MLA and CHO chromosome aberration assays was observed, whereas the percentage of positive Ames assays remained consistent. This was not unexpected because MLA and CHO cytogenetic assays have undergone the most substantive changes (e.g., the establishment of the Global Evaluation Factor for the MLA and the use of the relative increase in cell counts in CHO chromosome aberration assays). Over the last 5 years, there has been an increase in the percentage of positive results observed in the chromosome aberration assay in HPBL. It is speculated that this may have led to an increase in HPBL-positive results if the chemicals routed to HPBL had previous positive genotoxicity results. Another factor may be the lack of a reliable cytotoxicity measurement in the HPBL assay.