Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026
Clinical Anthropometrics and Body Composition from 3-Dimensional Optical Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2024
The estimation of the fat free mass index in athletes
Jeremy P Loenneke1, Jacob M Wilson, Mandy E Wray
1Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA ; Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance, University of Tampa, Tampa, USA ; Department of Nutritional Sciences, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA ; Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation. Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, USA ; Department of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.
Purpose:
The purpose of this investigation was to compare a practical measurement of fat free mass index (FFMI) from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) to the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) value in collegiate athletes.
Methods:
Thirty-three male baseball players and 16 female gymnasts volunteered to participate in this study during their respective pre-season. Subjects visited the laboratory once and had their measurements taken in the following order: weight, height, DEXA, and Omron HBF-500.
Results:
The BIA device investigated was not a valid estimate of FFMI when compared to the DEXA. The TE was 0.93 kg/ m(2) for males and 0.78 kg/ m(2) for females. There were also significant mean differences between the BIA prediction and the DEXA value for males (BIA=20.6 kg/m(2) vs. DEXA=21.1 kg/m(2), P=0.007) and females (BIA=16.2 kg/m(2) vs. DEXA=17.5 kg/m(2), P=0.001).
Conclusions:
The BIA device investigated in this study did not provide a valid estimate of FFMI in male and female collegiate athletes. Although there was a general tendency for the BIA to underestimate FFMI compared to DEXA, 98% of the estimates were within plus or minus 2 kg/ m(2). Therefore, while slightly biased, BIA may provide a reasonable (± 2 kg/ m(2)) estimate of nutritional status for practitioners who are unable able to afford more expensive equipment.
