Related Experiment Videos
Clopidogrel two doses comparative 1-year assessment of safety and efficacy (COMPASS) study in Japanese patients with
Shinichiro Uchiyama1, Norio Tanahashi, Kazuo Minematsu
1Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. suchiyam@nij.twmu.ac.jp
Insights
Clopidogrel 75 mg showed similar safety to 50 mg for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke in Japanese patients. The 75 mg dose may offer better clinical benefits, balancing safety and efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Clopidogrel 75 mg is standard for preventing recurrent ischemic events in Japan.
- A lower 50 mg dose is an option for patients at higher bleeding risk.
- This study evaluated clopidogrel safety in noncardioembolic ischemic stroke patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety of clopidogrel 75 mg versus 50 mg.
- To assess bleeding adverse events as the primary endpoint.
- To evaluate secondary safety and efficacy endpoints in Japanese stroke patients.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial in 118 Japanese institutions.
- 1,110 patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke randomized to 50 mg or 75 mg daily for 52 weeks.
- Primary endpoint: incidence of bleeding adverse events; Secondary: serious adverse events and vascular events.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in bleeding adverse events between 50 mg (14.0%) and 75 mg (16.5%) groups (p=0.2274).
- No significant differences in serious adverse events or serious bleeding events.
- Vascular event incidence was numerically lower with 75 mg but not statistically significant (3.8% vs 2.6%, p=0.4118).
Conclusions:
- Clopidogrel 75 mg demonstrates an acceptable safety profile compared to 50 mg.
- The 75 mg dose may offer superior clinical benefit for secondary stroke prevention in eligible Japanese patients.
- The trial supports 75 mg clopidogrel for its balance of safety and efficacy.
Background:
Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily is licensed in Japan for the prevention of recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular events in adults as the usual dosage. However, a lower dose (50 mg) is an option in patients at an increased risk of bleeding depending on age, body weight and symptoms. This study compared the safety of both 75- and 50-mg doses of clopidogrel in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.
Methods:
This was a double-blind, double-dummy postmarketing clinical trial carried out across 118 Japanese institutions. Patients with an episode of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke at least 8 days prior to randomization, who were aged <75 years or had a body weight >50 kg were randomized to 50 or 75 mg clopidogrel once daily for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding adverse events. The secondary safety endpoints included the incidence of serious adverse events, serious bleeding adverse events and other prespecified adverse events. The secondary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of vascular events, including ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and peripheral artery disease.
Results:
A total of 1,110 patients were randomized to clopidogrel 50 mg (n = 558) or 75 mg (n = 552). No significant difference between the groups was detected in the incidence of bleeding adverse events, which was 14.0 and 16.5% in the clopidogrel 50- and 75-mg groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.831, 95% CI = 0.615-1.124, p = 0.2274). Additionally, there was no statistical difference with respect to any of the secondary safety endpoints. No significant difference between the groups was detected in the incidence of serious adverse events, which was 8.6 and 9.5% in the clopidogrel 50- and 75-mg groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.877, 95% CI = 0.597-1.289, p = 0.5035), and there was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of serious bleeding events, which was 1.7 and 1.5% in the clopidogrel 50- and 75-mg groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.240, 95% CI = 0.489-3.142, p = 0.6496). The percentages of intracranial hemorrhage in the 50- and 75-mg groups were 0.18% (1/558) and 0.18% (1/552), respectively. The cumulative incidence of vascular events was somewhat lower in the 75-mg group, but was not statistically different (2.6 vs. 3.8%; p = 0.4118).
Conclusions:
Clopidogrel 75 mg provides a clinically acceptable safety profile and suggests better clinical benefit as compared to clopidogrel 50 mg for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in Japanese patients who are <75 years old with a body weight >50 kg, considering the balance of safety and efficacy on this trial.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications