Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

A Murine Model of Hemodialysis Access-Related Hand Dysfunction
Published on: May 31, 2022
Hemodialysis vascular access: everything you always wanted to know about it (but were afraid to ask)
Massimo Torreggiani1, Maria Lucia Scaramuzzi, Alessandra Manini
1Unit of Nephrology and Hemodialysis, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation IRCCS, University of Pavia, Pavia - Italy.
Insights
Arteriovenous fistulas are the preferred vascular access for dialysis due to fewer complications and lower costs. However, central venous catheter use is increasing, necessitating a review of vascular access options.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Vascular Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Effective dialysis treatment relies heavily on appropriate vascular access.
- Options include arteriovenous fistulas, grafts, and central venous catheters, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages.
- Vascular access complications and costs vary significantly among the different types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the prevalence of various vascular access types for dialysis.
- To analyze the benefits and complications associated with each access method.
- To discuss recent findings and trends in dialysis vascular access.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of recent studies on dialysis vascular access.
- Comparative analysis of arteriovenous fistulas, grafts, and central venous catheters.
- Examination of epidemiological data on vascular access utilization.
Main Results:
- Arteriovenous fistulas are generally considered the optimal choice due to a favorable balance of benefits and complications.
- There is a concerning increase in the use of central venous catheters for initiating dialysis, even in developed nations.
- Prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas remains lower in the United States compared to Europe.
Conclusions:
- Despite the superiority of arteriovenous fistulas, their uptake is suboptimal.
- The rising trend of central venous catheter use highlights challenges in vascular access planning and execution.
- Nephrologists increasingly require interventional skills to maintain vascular access patency.
Abstract:
Vascular accesses are essential for effective dialysis treatment. Arteriovenous fistulas, grafts and central venous catheters are the options available to the nephrologist, but they all have their pros and cons. All of the 3 types of vascular access share the same complications but at different rates, and their costs vary enormously, with on balance the arteriovenous fistula being the best choice. Nevertheless, recently the number of incident patients starting dialysis treatment with a venous catheter as vascular access has been steadily increasing. This is true even for more advanced countries such as the United States, where despite the efforts made to promote the use of fistulas, their prevalence is still low compared with Europe. Moreover, nowadays nephrologists are required to master technical skills that once were those of surgeons and to perform interventions to preserve the patency of the access. The aim of this paper is to review the prevalence, benefits and complications of the different vascular accesses in light of the most recent findings.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Dialysis
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure
