Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Recording Brain Electromagnetic Activity During the Administration of the Gaseous Anesthetic Agents Xenon and Nitrous Oxide in Healthy Volunteers
Published on: January 13, 2018
Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography
Razieh Fallah1, Mohammad Hosein Ataee Nakhaei, Shekofah Behdad
1Department of Pediatrics, Research Center of Pain, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Insights
Oral chloral hydrate is more effective than intranasal midazolam for sedating children during brain CT scans. Both medications demonstrated similar safety profiles, making chloral hydrate a suitable option for pediatric sedation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Radiology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Sedation is crucial for pediatric brain CT scans.
- Assessing effective and safe sedation methods for children is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of oral chloral hydrate versus intranasal midazolam for pediatric sedation during brain CT scans.
Main Methods:
- A single-blind randomized clinical trial involving 60 children aged 1-10 years.
- Participants received either oral chloral hydrate (100 mg/kg) or intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg).
- Sedation efficacy was assessed using the Ramsay sedation score (target: 4), and successful CT completion was recorded.
Main Results:
- Adequate sedation and successful CT scan completion were achieved in 76.7% of the chloral hydrate group versus 40% in the midazolam group (P=0.004).
- No significant difference in the frequency of side effects was observed between the two groups (10% for chloral hydrate, 3.3% for midazolam; P=0.34).
Conclusions:
- Oral chloral hydrate is a safe and effective option for pediatric sedation during brain CT scans.
- Chloral hydrate demonstrated superior efficacy compared to intranasal midazolam in this study population.
Abstract:
We conducted this single blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of oral chloral hydrate and intranasal midazolam for induction of sedation for computerized tomography scan of brain in children. Participants aged 1-10 years (n=60) were randomized to receive 100 mg/kg chloral hydrate orally with intra nasal normal saline OR intranasal midazolam 0.2 mg/kg with oral normal saline. Adequate sedation (Ramsay sedation score of four) was obtained and CT scan completed successfully in 76.7% of chloral hydrate group and in 40% of midazolam group (P=0.004). No significant difference was seen for side effects frequency between the two drugs (10% in chloral hydrate, 3.3% in midazolam group; P=0.34). We conclude that oral chloral hydrate can be considered as a safe and effective drug for sedation in children undergoing CT scan of brain.
Related Concept Videos
Stages of General Anesthesia
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
