Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
A Comparison of Vaginal vs. Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor-Double Blind Randomized Trial
Promila Jindal1, Kumkum Avasthi, Maninder Kaur
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, 20-B, Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana, 141001 Punjab India.
Objective:
To compare efficacy and safety of 50 μgm misoprostol vaginal with oral for labor induction.
Methods:
110 women at term gestation, Bishop score ≤4, with various indications for labor induction were randomized and double blinded. After decoding 51 women had received misoprostol orally and 52 vaginally, four hourly (maximum six doses) or till woman went into active labor.
Results:
Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 11.0. In vaginal misoprostol group induction delivery interval was significantly less (9.79 vs. 16.47 h) and successful induction was significantly higher (90.38 vs. 74.51%) than oral group, with in 24 h of induction. As for as dose required is concerned in vaginal group 40.38% women needed two doses for delivery, in contrast 35.29% in oral group maximum six doses were required.
Conclusion:
Vaginal route of misoprostol is more effective labor inducing agent than oral.
Related Concept Videos
Intrauterine Drug Delivery Systems
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
Blinding
Blind Procedures
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...