Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Cardiovascular risk estimated in renal transplant recipients with the Framingham score
M V de Pádua Netto1, T C Campos Bonfim, E Nunes Costa
1Uberlandia Medical School and the Renal Transplant Service, Santa Catarina Hospital, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. marcus@nanet.com.br
Insights
The Framingham score underestimates cardiovascular risk in renal transplant patients. This traditional risk assessment tool fails to account for crucial nontraditional factors prevalent in this population.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in renal transplant recipients.
- Traditional risk scores, like the Framingham score, often underestimate CVD risk in this population.
- Nontraditional factors such as anemia and inflammation are recognized as significant CVD predictors in renal transplant patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the Framingham score in predicting cardiovascular events in renal transplant recipients.
- To assess the predictive accuracy of the Framingham score in a cohort specifically selected to exclude nontraditional risk factors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of medical records for patients transplanted between 2005 and 2010.
- Calculation of the Framingham score based on traditional risk factors: sex, age, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, smoking status, and diabetes mellitus.
- Projected 10-year absolute risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
Main Results:
- The study included 126 renal transplant patients (44 women, 82 men; mean age 45 ± 16 years).
- The Framingham score classified 59% of patients as low risk, 30% as medium risk, and 11% as high risk for CVD over 10 years.
- The etiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD) included hypertension (58%) and diabetes (37%).
Conclusions:
- The Framingham risk score inadequately reflects the high observed CVD mortality and morbidity in renal transplant recipients.
- The score's limitations stem from its exclusion of essential nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors relevant to this patient group.
- Alternative or modified risk assessment tools are necessary for accurately evaluating CVD risk in renal transplant populations.
Background:
Cardiovascular disease is responsible for much of the mortality and morbidity observed in the renal transplant population. Some studies have applied the Framingham score mainly to the chronic kidney disease (CKD) on renal replacement therapy in an attempt to predict cardiovascular events, but the results underestimated the risk. It became evident at the participation of so-called nontraditional factors, such as anemia and inflammatory markers among others, were important predictors of risk in this population.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to apply the Framingham score to a population of renal transplant subjects to assess its quality to predict cardiovascular events among a population without the theoretically nontraditional risk factors.
Methods:
We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients transplanted from 2005 to 2010 for the score as determined by sex, age, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking history, and presence of diabetes mellitus. The final results expressed the risk for absolute development of cardiovascular diseases at the end of 10 years.
Results:
Among 126 patients including 44 women and, 82 men of mean age 45 ± 16 years were 64 living-related and 62 deceased-donor grafts. The etiology of CKD was hypertension (58%), diabetes (37%), and other causes (5%). Fifty-nine percent of patients had a low risk of developing coronary artery diseases at the end of 10 years, 30% medium risk, and only 11% high risk when measured by the Framingham score.
Conclusions:
The assessment of cardiovascular risk using the Framingham risk score did not reflect the observations in the literature of both high mortality and high morbidity. Therefore, this was not a good method to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease, probably because it does not include cardiovascular risk factors in addition to traditional ones that are important in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Renal Failure: Dose Adjustments
Reduced renal clearance and elimination rate are common outcomes of renal impairment. These alterations lead to a prolonged elimination half-life and an altered apparent volume of distribution for drugs. As a result, dosage adjustments are typically necessary to maintain optimal drug levels in the body.
However, dosage adjustments...
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure