Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The developmental pattern of calcium mobilisation during embryogenesis in Muscovy ducks.

British poultry science·2026
Same author

Challenging Spontaneous Quantum Collapse with the XENONnT Dark Matter Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Loss-Tolerant Detection of Squeezed States in the 2  μm Region.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Group equivariant pyramid network for respiratory motion correction on PET image.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same author

[Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis versus laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation: a multicenter retrospective cohort study].

Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery·2025
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for length-biased data.

J Ning1, J Qin, M Asgharian

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. jning@mdanderson.org

Statistics in Medicine
|October 3, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new statistical method to accurately estimate survival data in length-biased samples, addressing limitations in current research for epidemiological studies. The findings offer improved margin of error estimation for survival analysis in prevalent cohorts.

More Related Videos

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data
04:57

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data

Published on: May 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data
04:57

Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data

Published on: May 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • Logistic constraints often prevent incident cohort studies.
  • Prevalent cohort studies offer an alternative but yield biased samples due to length bias.
  • Existing methods for estimating margins of error in length-biased data are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a simple and effective method for estimating margins of error in length-biased survival data.
  • To address the lack of established statistical tools for analyzing prevalent cohort studies.
  • To improve the accuracy of survival estimates in epidemiological research.

Main Methods:

  • Adapted empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for right-censored length-biased survival data.
  • Investigated the behavior of these confidence intervals in both large and small sample sizes.
  • Applied the method to survival data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.

Main Results:

  • Developed and validated a novel method for calculating confidence intervals in length-biased survival data.
  • Demonstrated the utility of empirical likelihood for addressing sampling bias.
  • Provided a practical tool for analyzing survival in prevalent cohorts.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed empirical likelihood method provides a statistically sound approach to estimate margins of error in length-biased survival data.
  • This method enhances the reliability of survival estimates derived from prevalent cohort studies.
  • The approach is applicable to various epidemiological studies, including dementia survival analysis.