Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why Empirical Risk Minimization Performs Well for Open Set Domain Adaptation: A Theoretical Analysis From Causal View.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2026
Same author

Toward Comprehensive Information-Theoretic Multi-View Learning.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same author

Prunus persica (L.) Batsch root enriched Pseudomonas for enhanced saline-alkali tolerance by inducing fatty acid and flavonoid biosynthesis.

Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB·2026
Same author

Retraction notice to "Novel dynamic fuzzy decision-making framework for COVID-19 vaccine dose recipients" [J. Adv. Res. 37 (2022) 147-168].

Journal of advanced research·2025
Same author

Queuing-theory-driven renewable energy investment decisions through artificial expert choices with dynamic hybrid multi-facet fuzzy modeling.

iScience·2025
Same author

Progressive Training for Learning From Label Proportions.

IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems·2025
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Multi-level opinion dynamics under bounded confidence.

Gang Kou1, Yiyi Zhao, Yi Peng

  • 1School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Plos One
|October 3, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new opinion dynamics model for heterogeneous agents. Simulations show opinion convergence depends on agent confidence levels, initial opinions, and group size.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Social dynamics
  • Computational social science
  • Opinion formation

Background:

  • Existing opinion dynamics models often assume homogeneous confidence levels among agents.
  • Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence have been explored by Deffuant, Krause, et al.
  • A gap exists in modeling opinion evolution within groups with varying confidence levels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an extended model for opinion dynamics in social communities with heterogeneous confidence levels.
  • To investigate the impact of social differentiation and multi-level opinion formation.
  • To analyze collective opinion evolution based on key influencing factors.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of social differentiation theory to divide groups into opinion subgroups.
  • Formulation of a multi-level heterogeneous opinion formation model within a bounded confidence framework.
  • Conducting computer simulations to observe opinion evolution.

Main Results:

  • The number of final opinions is influenced by the fraction of close-minded agents.
  • Closer initial opinions facilitate easier convergence of final opinions.
  • Group size and the fraction of close-minded agents linearly affect the number of final opinions.

Conclusions:

  • Heterogeneous confidence levels significantly impact opinion dynamics.
  • The proposed model provides insights into complex opinion formation in diverse social groups.
  • Simulation results offer a quantifiable understanding of factors driving collective opinion evolution.