Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

05:16
Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
Published on: October 15, 2014
Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes
Francisco Cervantes Constantino1, Leyla Pinggera, Supathum Paranamana
1Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Plos One
|October 3, 2012
Summary
Listeners are highly sensitive to new sounds appearing in complex auditory scenes, detecting them quickly. However, they struggle to notice when sounds disappear, especially as the scene becomes more crowded.
Area of Science:
- Auditory perception
- Psychoacoustics
- Cognitive neuroscience
Background:
- Sudden environmental changes require rapid detection for survival.
- Hearing acts as an early warning system, directing attention to novel events.
- Understanding auditory change perception is key to explaining how we navigate complex soundscapes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate listener sensitivity to changes in complex acoustic scenes.
- To determine factors influencing auditory 'pop-out' and attention capture.
- To differentiate perception of auditory item appearance versus disappearance.
Main Methods:
- Utilized artificial acoustic scenes composed of pure-tone components with varying modulation rates.
- Manipulated scene complexity (scene-size) and introduced interruptions (gaps, distractors).
- Measured change detection and identification performance, along with response times.
Main Results:
- Listeners excelled at detecting and identifying appearing sounds, showing rapid responses and minimal effect of scene size.
- Detecting disappearing sounds proved difficult, with performance declining sharply as scene size increased and slow response times.
- Silent gaps impaired appearance detection more than disappearance, while distractors hindered both.
Conclusions:
- Auditory change detection relies on low-level processes, including sensitivity to transients and neural adaptation.
- The robust perceptual representation of item appearance suggests a bias towards detecting additions over deletions.
- Findings parallel visual change detection mechanisms, highlighting shared principles in sensory processing.
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Perception of Sound Waves
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same frequency...
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same frequency...
Echo
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Detection of Black Holes
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
Hearing
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
