Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Implantation of Electroencephalogram and Electrocardiogram Telemetry Devices in Neonatal Rabbit Kits
Published on: February 28, 2025
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in lamotrigine randomized-controlled trials
Torbjörn Tomson1, Lawrence J Hirsch, Daniel Friedman
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
This study found no statistically significant difference in the rate of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) between lamotrigine (LTG) and comparator groups in randomized trials. However, wide confidence intervals mean a clinically significant effect cannot be ruled out.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Epilepsy Research
Background:
- Nonrandomized studies on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) risk are prone to confounding factors like seizure frequency and polypharmacy.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) offer a more robust method to assess AEDs' relationship with SUDEP.
- Lamotrigine (LTG) is a widely used AED, necessitating a clear understanding of its SUDEP risk profile.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the risk of SUDEP associated with lamotrigine (LTG) compared to active comparators and placebo.
- To analyze data from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) conducted between 1984 and 2009.
- To mitigate confounding factors inherent in nonrandomized SUDEP studies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 7,774 subjects across 42 RCTs, focusing on 39 on-treatment deaths.
- Independent blinded review of death narratives by three clinical experts to determine SUDEP classification (definite, probable, possible, non-SUDEP).
- Comparison of definite or probable SUDEP risk between LTG and comparator arms using exact statistical methods, stratified by trial type (placebo-controlled, active-comparator, crossover).
Main Results:
- Eight definite/probable SUDEP events occurred among 29 on-treatment deaths.
- The unadjusted rate of definite/probable SUDEP for LTG was 2.2 per 1,000-patient years (95% CI 0.70-5.4).
- Odds ratios for SUDEP showed no statistically significant differences between LTG and comparator groups across placebo-controlled (OR 0.22), active-comparator (OR 2.18), and crossover trials (OR 1.08), though confidence intervals were wide.
Conclusions:
- No statistically significant difference in SUDEP rates was observed between lamotrigine and comparator groups in the analyzed RCTs.
- The wide confidence intervals associated with the SUDEP risk estimates indicate that a clinically important effect cannot be excluded.
- Further research with larger sample sizes may be needed to definitively establish the SUDEP risk associated with LTG.
More Related Videos
10:25Multi-system Monitoring for Identification of Seizures, Arrhythmias and Apnea in Conscious Restrained Rabbits
Published on: March 27, 2021
08:28Methods for ECG Evaluation of Indicators of Cardiac Risk, and Susceptibility to Aconitine-induced Arrhythmias in Rats Following Status Epilepticus
Published on: April 5, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Antiepileptic Drugs: Potassium Channel Activators
Ezogabine has gained approval as an adjunctive treatment...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Glutamate Antagonists
Antiepileptic Drugs: Modulators of Neurotransmitter Release Mediated by SV2A Protein
SV2A is a transmembrane glycoprotein located predominantly in the brain, modulating the release of neurotransmitters for neuronal communication. Both levetiracetam and brivaracetam exhibit a high affinity for...
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Epilepsy and Seizures: Overview
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...
Antiepileptic Drugs: Sodium Channel Blockers
Sodium channel blockers modulate ion channels, particularly voltage-gated sodium channels. They block only sodium ion movement.
Among the most commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs are...