Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Quadratic Models01:23

Quadratic Models

Quadratic models are mathematical representations used to describe relationships in which the rate of change changes at a constant rate. These models appear in a wide variety of natural and engineered systems, especially those involving motion, forces, and optimization. One common application is analyzing the vertical motion of objects influenced by gravity, such as a ball thrown into the air.In such scenarios, the object's height changes over time in a curved pattern, rising to a maximum point...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Sampling Continuous Time Signal01:11

Sampling Continuous Time Signal

In signal processing, a continuous-time signal can be sampled using an impulse-train sampling technique, followed by the zero-order hold method. Impulse-train sampling involves the use of a periodic impulse train, which consists of a series of delta functions spaced at regular intervals determined by the sampling period. When a continuous-time signal is multiplied by this impulse train, it generates impulses with amplitudes corresponding to the signal's values at the sampling points.
In the...
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A stakeholder-inclusive conceptual framework for modeling routinely collected health data for therapeutic decision-making illustrated by means of multistate models.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

From manual entry to machine precision: challenges and evolution of metadata schema development in collaborative research centers.

BMC research notes·2026
Same author

Systematic Evaluation of Plasma and Urine Metabolites to Predict the Risk of Adverse Kidney-related Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: The GCKD Study∗.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

TACR3 variant confers resilience to aging and Alzheimer's disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

mmContext: an open framework for multimodal contrastive learning of omics and text data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Comparison between splines and fractional polynomials for multivariable model building with continuous covariates: a

Harald Binder1, Willi Sauerbrei, Patrick Royston

  • 1Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55101 Mainz, Germany. binderh@uni-mainz.de

Statistics in Medicine
|October 5, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) and spline methods are compared for explanatory modeling in observational studies. MFP performs better with medium data, while splines excel with complex functions.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Statistical modeling
  • Biomedical data analysis
  • Observational research

Background:

  • Observational studies frequently involve numerous covariates influencing outcomes.
  • Explanatory models aim to identify important variables and their functional forms, distinct from purely predictive models.
  • Spline-based and multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) procedures are common methods for variable and functional form selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of spline-based procedures and the multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) procedure for model selection in explanatory modeling.
  • To evaluate these methods under varying data conditions, including sample size and variance explained, reflecting realistic biomedical data.
  • To assess model performance using criteria such as prediction error, covariate selection accuracy, and functional form appropriateness.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted within a linear regression framework.
  • The study simulated realistic biomedical data structures with 15 potential covariates.
  • Key simulation parameters included sample size (200 vs. 1000), variance explained (R-squared of 0.2 vs. 0.8), and model selection complexity parameters.

Main Results:

  • Explanatory models could not be reliably obtained with limited information (small sample size, low R-squared).
  • Prediction performance was comparable across all evaluated model types.
  • With medium amounts of information, MFP outperformed splines on several criteria, particularly in recovering simpler functions, whereas splines were better for complex functions.

Conclusions:

  • The amount of information significantly impacts the ability to derive suitable explanatory models.
  • MFP demonstrates advantages in specific scenarios (medium information, simpler functions), while splines are more adept at capturing complex functional relationships.
  • Under conditions of ample information and no local structure, MFP and spline procedures tend to yield similar explanatory models.