Inhibition of Marburg virus budding by nonneutralizing antibodies to the envelope glycoprotein

Masahiro Kajihara1, Andrea Marzi, Eri Nakayama

  • 1Division of Global Epidemiology, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Sapporo, Japan.

Journal of Virology
|October 5, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Marburg virus (MARV) envelope glycoprotein (GP)-specific antibodies inhibit virus release by preventing particle budding. This reveals a new mechanism for antibody-mediated protection against MARV infection.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Immunology
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • The Marburg virus (MARV) envelope glycoprotein (GP) is crucial for host cell entry and is a primary target for neutralizing antibodies.
  • While Ebola virus (EBOV) neutralization mechanisms are increasingly understood, MARV infectivity regulation by antibodies remains less clear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanism by which MARV GP-specific antibodies regulate MARV infectivity.
  • To identify novel antibody-mediated inhibition strategies against MARV.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized MARV GP-specific monoclonal antibodies (AGP127-8 and MGP72-17) and their Fab fragments.
  • Assessed antibody effects on MARV entry, virus budding, and the formation of virus-like particles (VLPs).
  • Performed morphological analyses of VLP-producing cells in the presence of antibodies.

Main Results:

  • MARV GP-specific antibodies AGP127-8 (IgG1) and MGP72-17 (IgM) significantly reduced progeny virus release without inhibiting cell entry.
  • These antibodies inhibited the formation of MARV VLPs, an effect not observed with the AGP127-8 Fab fragment.
  • Morphological studies showed antibodies caused VLPs to aggregate on the surface of infected cells, arresting budding.

Conclusions:

  • Demonstrated a novel antibody-mediated mechanism inhibiting MARV budding by arresting nascent virus particles on the cell surface.
  • Suggests that antibodies targeting MARV GP can contribute to protective immunity through mechanisms beyond classical neutralization.
  • Highlights that classical neutralizing activity is not the sole determinant of protective MARV antibodies for prophylactic and therapeutic applications.