Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Percutaneous coronary intervention or prehospital thrombolysis? What is the preferred treatment in S-T elevation
1Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. martinhiscock@hotmail.com
Abstract:
There is no situation in medicine where outcome is so utterly dependent on time than in the treatment of patients with S-T elevation myocardial infarction. This life-threatening situation accounts for 30% of acute coronary syndromes. Prompt myocardial reperfusion saves lives, but health services need to be thoroughly organised to achieve this outcome. Unfortunately, a minority of patients in Australia present within 2 h of symptom onset and most patients receive reperfusion 3-4 h after. So health professionals begin at a disadvantage. A novel approach to this problem has been to give thrombolysis at first contact with the patient, before admission to hospital. A French study has assessed this practice against the gold standard treatment for S-T elevation myocardial infarction with some very interesting results. The implications of this study now challenge well-entrenched guidelines for the management of patients with this condition.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management