Current state of the performance of percutaneous coronary intervention in centres without on-site cardiac surgery
1Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia. oquelie@yahoo.com.au
Insights
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) now have significantly lower complication rates, making on-site cardiac surgery less critical. Hospitals without on-site surgery can achieve comparable outcomes for PCI, including for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Historically, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) necessitated on-site cardiac surgery due to complication risks.
- Significant advancements in pharmacotherapy and interventional techniques have drastically reduced complication rates requiring emergency surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PCI in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery.
- To compare outcomes of PCI in centers with and without on-site surgical backup.
Main Methods:
- Review of complication rates and outcomes in the balloon angioplasty era versus the current stent era.
- Comparison of primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery.
- Analysis of risk-adjusted mortality rates for PCI procedures.
Main Results:
- Complication rates requiring emergency surgery have decreased from 4-6% to 0.3-0.6% with routine stenting.
- Primary PCI at hospitals without on-site surgery improves outcomes and reduces length of stay compared to fibrinolysis.
- Door-to-balloon times are reduced when PCI is performed locally, even without on-site surgery.
- Risk-adjusted mortality for PCI in centers without surgical backup is comparable to centers with surgical backup.
Conclusions:
- On-site cardiac surgery is no longer a prerequisite for safe and effective PCI, including for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Successful PCI programs in hospitals without on-site surgery require adequate infrastructure and trained interventional cardiologists.
- Decentralization of PCI services to hospitals without on-site surgery is feasible and can improve patient access and outcomes.
Abstract:
Before the routine use of coronary stents, potential complications of percutaneous coronary interventions required the presence of backup cardiac surgery on-site. Advances in pharmacotherapy and interventional techniques, particularly in the last decade, have significantly decreased the rates of complications requiring emergency cardiac surgery, from approximately 4% to 6% in the balloon angioplasty era to as low as 0.3% to 0.6% in the contemporary era of routine intracoronary stent implantation. An early invasive approach has been shown to improve outcomes among patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS), particularly in those at the highest risk, emphasising the importance of early access to revascularisation premises in such patients. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction require immediate and sustained recanalisation of the culprit vessel to obtain rapid reperfusion of the threatened myocardium, in order to reduce infarct size and improve outcomes. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery improves clinical outcomes and reduces length of stay when compared with fibrinolytic therapy. It also significantly reduces door-to-balloon times when compared with transfer for percutaneous coronary interventions at hospitals with on-site surgery. It has been published that risk-adjusted mortality rates for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in centres without on-site surgical backup are comparable with those of percutaneous coronary intervention facilities that have cardiac surgery on-site, regardless of whether percutaneous coronary intervention was performed as primary therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or in a non-primary setting. To achieve these results however, an adequate percutaneous coronary intervention programme is required, including proper hospital infrastructure and appropriately trained interventional cardiologists.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care


