Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal processing in dyslexia.

K L Shapiro1, N Ogden, F Lind-Blad

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Journal of Learning Disabilities
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Summary of the Public Health Agency of Canada's <i>Action Plan on Lyme Disease</i>.

Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada·2018
Same author

There is inadequate evidence to support the division of the genus Borrelia.

International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology·2016
Same author

Identifying the last supper: utility of the DNA barcode library for bloodmeal identification in ticks.

Molecular ecology resources·2012
Same author

The attentional blink.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2011
Same author

The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: tests of an interference model.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2000
Same author

Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1998
Same journal

Associations Between Self-Reported Literacy and Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Children, Adolescents, and Older Adults.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Learning Disabilities Identification in U.S. Elementary Schools.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Universal Screening of Early Numeracy Skills in Spanish-Speaking Kindergarteners.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

AI Chatbots and Dyslexia: How AI Chatbots Empower Students With Dyslexia to Master Arithmetic Word Problems.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Instructional Decision-Making for Students With Intensive Early Writing Needs: Student Growth in Sentence-Level Curriculum-Based Measurement.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
Same journal

Effects of Calculation and Reading Fluency Interventions Focusing on Awareness and Adaptive Use of Strategies: Supporting Children With Comorbid Fluency Problems.

Journal of learning disabilities·2026
See all related articles

Children with dyslexia show impaired word recognition, especially with two-syllable words requiring temporal sequencing. This difficulty is not explained by differences in eye movements, suggesting potential sequential processing deficits in dyslexia.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Dyslexia is a common learning disorder affecting reading acquisition.
  • Temporal processing, the ability to sequence information, is crucial for reading complex words.
  • Previous research suggests potential timing deficits in individuals with dyslexia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate temporal processing deficits in children with dyslexia during word identification.
  • To determine if difficulties in sequencing multi-syllable words are specific to dyslexia.
  • To rule out eye movement differences as the primary cause for observed reading difficulties.

Main Methods:

  • Compared word identification accuracy in children with dyslexia versus age-matched and reading-matched controls.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Presented one- and two-syllable words at varying durations (100, 300, 3,000 msec).
  • Conducted a second experiment to analyze eye movement patterns during word identification tasks.

    • Main Results:

    • Children with dyslexia exhibited significantly lower accuracy in identifying two-syllable words presented for 300 msec.
    • No significant differences were found in one-syllable word identification accuracy between groups.
    • Eye movement analysis did not reveal differences that could explain the observed word identification deficits.

    Conclusions:

    • Findings suggest that children with dyslexia may have specific deficits in the sequential processing of auditory or visual information required for recognizing multi-syllable words.
    • These temporal processing difficulties, rather than oculomotor control, may underlie reading challenges in dyslexia.
    • Further research is warranted to explore interventions targeting sequential processing skills in dyslexia.