Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
Published on: May 1, 2020
The proposed GDM diagnostic criteria: a difference, to be a difference, must make a difference
Oded Langer1, Jason G Umans, Menachem Miodovnik
1Cookeville Regional Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Blvd, Cookeville, TN 38501, USA. odlanger@gmail.com
New gestational diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria from IADPSG, based on HAPO study, may increase diagnosis rates significantly. This review questions the justification of costs versus benefits and the global applicability of these new gestational diabetes mellitus guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Endocrinology
- Metabolic Disorders
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- The International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) proposed new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
- These criteria are derived from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study.
- The proposed criteria are expected to significantly increase GDM diagnosis rates globally.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the risks, costs, and benefits associated with the new IADPSG criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus.
- To evaluate the justification for implementing these criteria given potential increases in diagnosis rates and resource allocation.
- To address the controversy and lack of agreement surrounding the proposed diagnostic endpoints and their global applicability.
Main Methods:
- Review of the observational HAPO study results.
- Analysis of potential increases in gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis frequency based on ethnicity and obesity prevalence.
- Critical evaluation of the diagnostic endpoints and odds ratios used in the IADPSG criteria.
- Assessment of the global disparities in gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence.
Main Results:
- The IADPSG criteria may increase gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis rates by 2-8 fold, varying by ethnicity and obesity.
- Questions exist regarding the justification of costs and resources versus the proposed endpoints and their questionable validity.
- Significant global disparities in gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence raise concerns about the suitability of single diagnostic criteria for all populations.
Conclusions:
- The widespread adoption of new gestational diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria requires careful consideration of economic impact and resource allocation.
- Further research and debate are needed to validate the proposed diagnostic endpoints and ensure equitable application worldwide.
- The heterogeneity of gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence necessitates a nuanced approach to diagnosis rather than a one-size-fits-all strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains for...
Significance Testing: Overview
Differential Staining Technique

