Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hearing01:31

Hearing

When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolic costs of submerged activity in three species of Arctic seals.

Conservation physiology·2026
Same author

Sea lions as a natural model for charting the developmental course following in utero exposure to domoic acid.

Harmful algae·2026
Same author

An experimental approach to assess the combined effects of multiple stressors on a large vertebrate species.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same author

The combined effects of multiple stressors in an endangered, long-lived species: Lessons learned and ways forward.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2025
Same author

Sensitivity to airborne sounds in ice-dependent bearded seals.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2025
Same author

Low-frequency hearing and masking parameters in representative seals and sea lionsa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Temporal processing of low-frequency sounds by seals (L).

Colleen Reichmuth1, Asila Ghoul, Brandon L Southall

  • 1Long Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA. coll@ucsc.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|October 9, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Harbor seals have surprisingly long auditory integration times for low-frequency sounds. This study found no improved audibility for 200 Hz tones in seals when signal duration exceeded 500 ms.

More Related Videos

Long-term Time Lapse Imaging of Mouse Cochlear Explants
10:43

Long-term Time Lapse Imaging of Mouse Cochlear Explants

Published on: November 2, 2014

Recording Spatially Restricted Oscillations in the Hippocampus of Behaving Mice
07:10

Recording Spatially Restricted Oscillations in the Hippocampus of Behaving Mice

Published on: July 1, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Long-term Time Lapse Imaging of Mouse Cochlear Explants
10:43

Long-term Time Lapse Imaging of Mouse Cochlear Explants

Published on: November 2, 2014

Recording Spatially Restricted Oscillations in the Hippocampus of Behaving Mice
07:10

Recording Spatially Restricted Oscillations in the Hippocampus of Behaving Mice

Published on: July 1, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Marine Mammal Auditory Perception
  • Bioacoustics
  • Auditory Neuroscience

Background:

  • Previous research indicated auditory integration times exceeding 3000 ms in harbor seals for 200 Hz tones.
  • This finding contrasts with typical mammalian auditory time constants (<500 ms) for frequencies above 1 kHz.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the auditory integration time of harbor seals for low-frequency (200 Hz) tonal signals.
  • To determine if extended signal durations improve audibility in harbor seals.

Main Methods:

  • Auditory thresholds and reaction times were measured in a harbor seal for 200 Hz tones.
  • Tones were presented in air and water with durations of 500 ms and 2500 ms.

Main Results:

  • No significant gain in audibility was observed when signal duration increased from 500 ms to 2500 ms.
  • Auditory integration time for 200 Hz tones in harbor seals appears to plateau around 500 ms.

Conclusions:

  • The previously reported exceptionally long auditory integration times for harbor seals may not reflect a general improvement in audibility with duration.
  • Auditory processing in harbor seals for low frequencies may be limited by mechanisms other than simple integration time.