Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electroacoustic validation of a neck-based field attenuation estimation system.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Impaired Tone-in-Noise Detection in Individuals Who Report Temporary Hearing Symptoms After Noise Exposure.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Improving Sensitivity of Tinnitus Screening in Hearing Conservation Programs.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Personal attenuation rating as an indicator of audiometric threshold shifts.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Clinical Norms for Evaluating Hearing Difficulty in Patients with "Normal" Hearing Thresholds.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2025
Same author

Functional Consequences of Tinnitus in Military Service Members.

American journal of audiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.

Douglas S Brungart1, Nandini Iyer

  • 1Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20889, USA. douglas.brungart@us.army.mil

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|October 9, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Listeners can effectively use brief, fluctuating auditory cues from both ears to understand speech, even when challenging masking sounds are present. This study demonstrates that consolidating these cues into one ear maintains speech intelligibility.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
05:48

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
05:48

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Speech Processing

Background:

  • Listeners utilize the better-ear effect, leveraging binaural signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) advantages for speech intelligibility.
  • Complex masking scenarios, like front-facing targets with symmetric maskers, eliminate long-term SNR advantages, relying instead on rapid, fluctuating binaural cues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of binaural better-ear glimpses in speech intelligibility under challenging masking conditions.
  • To determine if consolidating these fluctuating glimpses into a single ear impacts speech understanding.

Main Methods:

  • A signal processing technique was employed to centralize binaural better-ear glimpses into a monaural signal.
  • Speech intelligibility was assessed using both the optimized monaural stimuli and unprocessed binaural stimuli.

Main Results:

  • Speech intelligibility was comparable between the optimized monaural condition and the unprocessed binaural condition.
  • This suggests that the auditory system can efficiently extract relevant information from rapidly fluctuating binaural cues.

Conclusions:

  • Normal-hearing listeners effectively utilize binaural better-ear glimpses for speech perception, even when these glimpses rapidly switch between ears and frequencies.
  • The ability to integrate information from these fleeting cues is robust, as demonstrated by similar performance with consolidated monaural stimuli.