Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Formation of Species01:31

Formation of Species

Speciation describes the formation of one or more new species from one or sometimes multiple original species. The resulting species are discrete from the parent species, and barriers to reproduction will typically exist. There are two primary mechanisms, speciation with and without geographic isolation—allopatric and sympatric speciation, respectively.
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Little information, great impact? A clinical tool for the prediction of electroconvulsive therapy effectiveness in depression.

BJPsych open·2026
Same author

Aspects of power sensitivity among social workers and social work students: a comparative study.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Results from AD-HEARING (ADherence to and adjustment of HEARING aids in clinical routine care as preventive dementia strategy): a prospective 6-month follow-up study on cognition and psychological well-being.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

Long-term retrieval performance is associated with CA1 hippocampal volume in older adults and individuals at risk for dementia.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2025
Same author

Effectiveness of, access to and need for electroconvulsive therapy in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a survey in Germany and Switzerland.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2025
Same author

Divergent psychological stress response patterns to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric patients with vs. without PTSD: A real-world exploratory study.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 18, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Spontaneous flocking in human groups.

Michael Belz1, Lennart W Pyritz, Margarete Boos

  • 1Courant Research Center Evolution of Social Behaviour, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Germany. mbelz1@uni-goettingen.de

Behavioural Processes
|October 9, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Human groups exhibit flocking behavior, showing spontaneous attraction to neighbors when visible. This collective movement reduces spatial dispersion, demonstrating a fundamental aspect of flocking without explicit instruction.

More Related Videos

The Large-Scale Cultivation of Nematodes to Study Their Collective Behaviors
03:32

The Large-Scale Cultivation of Nematodes to Study Their Collective Behaviors

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 18, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

The Large-Scale Cultivation of Nematodes to Study Their Collective Behaviors
03:32

The Large-Scale Cultivation of Nematodes to Study Their Collective Behaviors

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Collective Behavior
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Flocking behavior, a self-organized collective phenomenon, is observed in animal groups like bird flocks and fish shoals.
  • It involves spatial formation without global control or explicit recruitment signals, with spatial attraction being a key component.
  • While simulated in models, experimental evidence for human flocking behavior, specifically spatial attraction, has been lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally investigate the presence of spatial attraction, a core component of flocking behavior, in human groups.
  • To determine if humans exhibit spontaneous flocking tendencies in the absence of explicit instructions or social cues.
  • To analyze the impact of neighbor visibility on group spatial dispersion.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computer-based, multi-agent game simulating movement on a virtual playground.
  • Human participants played two conditions: a Single Game (invisible neighbors) and a Joint Game (visible neighbors within a local radius).
  • Collision avoidance and alignment sub-processes were excluded or held constant, focusing solely on spatial attraction.

Main Results:

  • Individuals spontaneously approached visible neighbors in the Joint Game, unlike in the Single Game.
  • The presence of visible neighbors led to reduced spatial dispersion of the entire group compared to moving alone.
  • This indicates a natural tendency towards aggregation when spatial information is available.

Conclusions:

  • Human groups demonstrate the fundamental component of flocking behavior (spatial attraction) organically.
  • This occurs without explicit instructions, rewards, or social cues, suggesting an innate mechanism for collective movement.
  • The findings provide the first experimental evidence of human flocking behavior in controlled conditions.