NMR Spectrometers: Radiofrequency Pulses and Pulse Sequences
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Bewley Lattice Diagram
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: May 18, 2026

High-speed Continuous-wave Stimulated Brillouin Scattering Spectrometer for Material Analysis
Published on: September 22, 2017
Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi1, Brian K Rutt, Adam B Kerr
1Global Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA.
This article presents a new, more efficient radiofrequency pulse design for mapping magnetic field strength in MRI scanners. By using adiabatic pulses, the method improves measurement sensitivity, allowing for faster scans or clearer images while reducing the energy absorbed by the patient.
Area of Science:
Background:
Magnetic resonance imaging relies on precise knowledge of radiofrequency field distribution for accurate quantification. Standard mapping techniques often face limitations regarding energy deposition and scan duration. The Bloch-Siegert shift offers a rapid approach for mapping these fields. However, existing implementations frequently encounter high energy absorption rates and extended echo times. This gap motivated researchers to seek alternative pulse shapes to improve performance. Prior work has established the utility of these shifts in field mapping. Yet, no prior work had resolved the trade-off between sensitivity and energy constraints. That uncertainty drove the development of the proposed adiabatic pulse design.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study is to introduce an adiabatic radiofrequency pulse design for optimizing off-resonant Bloch-Siegert field mapping. Current mapping methods often suffer from high energy absorption and prolonged echo times. The researchers seek to enhance measurement sensitivity for a fixed pulse duration. This improvement addresses the limitations of conventional pulse shapes used in clinical scanners. By optimizing the pulse, the authors intend to provide a more efficient tool for field quantification. The motivation stems from the need to balance scan speed with image quality at high field strengths. No prior work had resolved these specific efficiency trade-offs using adiabatic designs. This investigation provides a systematic evaluation of the proposed pulse performance in both simulations and human imaging.
Main Methods:
Review approach involves numerical modeling to optimize the radiofrequency pulse envelope for enhanced field sensitivity. The investigators employ computational simulations to compare different pulse shapes under controlled conditions. Experimental validation occurs using physical phantoms to confirm the predicted performance gains. Furthermore, the team conducts in vivo brain imaging at 3T and 7T field strengths. This approach ensures that the theoretical improvements translate to practical imaging scenarios. The researchers systematically vary pulse parameters to identify the most efficient configurations. Data collection focuses on measuring the shift magnitude and signal quality across various settings. This comprehensive strategy allows for a robust assessment of the proposed pulse design.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature demonstrate that the numerically optimized 2-millisecond adiabatic pulse achieves 2.5 times greater efficiency than a 6-millisecond Fermi-shaped pulse. The researchers show that this increased efficiency enables higher sensitivity for a given pulse width. The data confirm that the adiabatic design successfully reduces the energy deposition burden. Performance validation in phantoms reveals consistent results with the numerical predictions. In vivo imaging at 3T and 7T field strengths confirms the practical utility of the method. The results indicate that the adiabatic pulse maintains mapping accuracy while improving scan speed. The study highlights that the extra sensitivity can be effectively traded for faster acquisition times. These findings provide a clear quantitative advantage over conventional pulse shapes used in field mapping.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that adiabatic pulses offer a superior alternative to conventional Fermi-shaped designs for field mapping. Synthesis and implications suggest that these pulses significantly enhance measurement efficiency. The researchers demonstrate that shorter pulse durations can achieve higher sensitivity than longer traditional counterparts. This improvement allows for either increased signal-to-noise ratios or reduced scan times in clinical settings. The study validates these performance gains through both phantom and human brain imaging experiments. The findings indicate that adiabatic designs mitigate energy absorption concerns while maintaining mapping accuracy. The authors conclude that this approach provides a flexible tool for optimizing magnetic resonance protocols. These results support the adoption of adiabatic pulses for high-field imaging applications.
The researchers propose an adiabatic radiofrequency pulse design to optimize off-resonant Bloch-Siegert shifts. This mechanism increases measurement sensitivity for a fixed pulse duration, allowing for either improved signal-to-noise ratios or faster scan speeds compared to traditional Fermi-shaped pulses.
The authors utilize numerical simulations to refine pulse shapes and validate performance through phantom experiments. They specifically compare the efficiency of a 2-millisecond adiabatic pulse against a 6-millisecond Fermi-shaped pulse, confirming a 2.5-fold increase in efficiency for the adiabatic design.
The researchers state that the adiabatic pulse is necessary to overcome the high Specific Absorption Rate and long echo times inherent in standard mapping. By optimizing the pulse shape, they achieve higher sensitivity, which is required to maintain accuracy while reducing energy deposition.
The study employs numerical simulations to model pulse behavior and phantom experiments to verify the results. These data types are essential for demonstrating that the adiabatic pulse maintains mapping accuracy while significantly improving efficiency at both 3T and 7T field strengths.
The researchers measure the efficiency of the pulse design by comparing the sensitivity of a 2-millisecond adiabatic pulse to a 6-millisecond Fermi-shaped pulse. They report that the adiabatic version is 2.5 times more efficient at mapping the radiofrequency field.
The authors suggest that this design allows for more flexible imaging protocols. They propose that the extra sensitivity gained can be traded off for faster scan times or used to improve the angle-to-noise ratio in B1+ maps at high field strengths like 7T.