Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 18, 2026
07:12
Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging of Mouse Diaphragm Function
Published on: April 21, 2014
The ultrasonic harmonic scalpel for circumcision: experimental evaluation using dogs
Mou Peng1, Zhe Meng, Zhong-Hua Yang
1Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
Asian Journal of Andrology
|October 9, 2012
Summary
Ultracision harmonic scalpel (UHS) circumcision in dogs offers a faster procedure with significantly less blood loss and fewer complications compared to conventional scalpels. This study supports UHS as a promising technique for male circumcision.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Innovation
- Veterinary Surgery
Background:
- Male circumcision is a common surgical procedure globally.
- Development of novel techniques aims to improve postoperative outcomes.
- Existing methods carry risks of operative time, blood loss, and complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of using the ultracision harmonic scalpel (UHS) for male circumcision.
- To compare UHS circumcision with conventional scalpel methods in a canine model.
Main Methods:
- Sixteen adult male dogs were divided into two groups: UHS and conventional scalpel.
- Procedures were performed, and outcomes were assessed one week post-surgery.
- Key metrics included operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications.
Main Results:
- Mean operative time for UHS was 5.1 min vs. 35.5 min for conventional scalpel.
- Mean blood loss was <2 ml for UHS vs. 15 ml for conventional scalpel.
- UHS group had one mild edema case; conventional group had two edema, one infection, and one bleeding case.
Conclusions:
- Circumcision using UHS is a novel technique with reduced operative time, blood loss, and complications.
- The findings suggest UHS is a superior alternative to conventional scalpels for male circumcision.
- This study provides a foundation for future clinical trials in human patients.