Is psychoanalysis a matter of subjectivation?

Area of Science:

• Psychology
• Psychoanalysis
• Social Psychology

Background:

• Subjectivity develops through a dynamic interplay between internal psychic processes and external intersubjective experiences.
• The formation of a subject is contingent upon authentic relationships where individuals are recognized as desiring beings, not mere objects.
• Internalization of intersubjectivity requires trust in mutual recognition, with its absence leading to narcissistic tendencies.

Purpose of the Study:

• To examine the two primary movements of psychic life involved in the process of subjectivation.
• To explore the concept of the 'subjectivating link' and its dependence on recognizing the other as a desiring subject.
• To analyze the impact of trust and mutual recognition on the internalization of intersubjectivity and the potential for narcissistic fallback.

Main Methods:

• Conceptual analysis of psychic development and intersubjectivity.
• Exploration of psychoanalytic theory regarding subject formation and narcissistic positions.
• Examination of the role of trust and mutual recognition in establishing lasting preconscious predispositions.

Main Results:

• Subjectivation is a continuous process influenced by both intrapsychic dynamics and intersubjective interactions.
• The 'subjectivating link' is crucial, requiring the authentic recognition of the other's desire.
• A deficit in mutual recognition can lead to narcissistic self-constitution through object subjugation.
• Psychoanalytic practice can facilitate change by altering the balance of psychic trends and acknowledging multiple subject positions.

Conclusions:

• Subjectivity is not innate but constructed through a complex interplay of internal and relational factors.
• The psychoanalytic encounter offers a space for modifying psychic equilibria and fostering lasting change.
• Theoretical pluralism and diverse clinical practices are essential for addressing the multifaceted nature of subjectivation.