Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

A Common Marmoset Model of Mother-Infant Intervention for Breastfeeding Disorders in the Presence of Paternal Inhibition and Maternal Neglect
Published on: September 22, 2023
Preventing abusive head trauma resulting from a failure of normal interaction between infants and their caregivers
1Developmental Neurosciences and Child Health, Child and Family Research Institute, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada. rbarr@cw.bc.ca
Insights
Infant crying, often seen as a problem, is a normal developmental stage. This normal crying is the most common trigger for abusive head trauma (AHT), suggesting new prevention strategies are needed.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Abusive head trauma (AHT), including shaken baby syndrome, is a severe form of infant abuse.
- The role of normal infant crying as a trigger for AHT has been historically underestimated.
- Clinical interpretations often view excessive infant crying as indicative of problems with the infant, caregiver, or their interaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present an alternative developmental interpretation of early infant crying.
- To review evidence linking normal infant crying patterns to abusive head trauma.
- To explore implications for primary prevention strategies for infant abuse.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of developmental psychology and pediatrics research.
- Analysis of clinical interpretations of infant crying.
- Examination of the relationship between infant crying and abusive head trauma.
Main Results:
- Early increases in infant crying are a typical developmental phase in healthy infants.
- This normal crying pattern is the most frequent trigger for abusive head trauma.
- AHT can be conceptualized as a failure in normal infant-caregiver interactions.
Conclusions:
- Reinterpreting infant crying as a normal developmental behavior is crucial.
- Understanding normal crying patterns can inform the prevention of abusive head trauma.
- Universal public health strategies targeting caregiver knowledge can reduce infant abuse.
Abstract:
Head trauma from abuse, including shaken baby syndrome, is a devastating and potentially lethal form of infant physical abuse first recognized in the early 1970s. What has been less recognized is the role of the early increase in crying in otherwise normal infants in the first few months of life as a trigger for the abuse. In part, this is because infant crying, especially prolonged unsoothable crying, has been interpreted clinically as something wrong with the infant, the infant's caregiver, or the interactions between them. Here, we review an alternative developmental interpretation, namely, that the early increase in crying is a typical behavioral development in normal infants and usually does not reflect anything wrong or abnormal. We also review evidence indicating that this normal crying pattern is the most common trigger for abusive head trauma (AHT). Together, these findings point to a conceptualization of AHT as the consequence of a failure in an otherwise common, iterative, and developmentally normal infant-caregiver interaction. They also imply that there is a window of opportunity for prevention of AHT, and potentially other forms of infant abuse, through a public health primary universal prevention strategy aimed at changing knowledge and behaviors of caregivers and society in general concerning normal development of infants and the significance of early increased infant crying. If effective, there may be important implications for prevention of infant abuse nationally and internationally.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Attachment
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...

