Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Causal inference of the effect of adiposity on bone mineral density in adults
Daruneewan Warodomwichit1, Chanika Sritara, Ammarin Thakkinstian
1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Objective:
The causal effect of adipose tissue on bone mass and the direction of its net influence have not been directly assessed in adult humans. Using the Mendelian randomization analysis, we assessed the causality of adiposity in measurements of bone mass in adult males and females.
Design And Methods:
Subjects consisted of 2154 adults aged 25-54 years from a cross-sectional cohort of the employees of the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. Body composition was determined after at least 3 h of fasting using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. A polymorphism in the fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO rs9939609) was used as an instrument in the Mendelian randomization analysis.
Results:
The genotype distribution of the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism was 61·1% TT, 33·9% AT and 5·0% AA. The average body mass index (BMI), body fat mass and percentage body fat were 23·9 kg/m(2) (SD = 3·6), 17·9 kg (SD = 6·6) and 26·8% (SD = 7·2), respectively. The FTO rs9939609 polymorphism was significantly correlated with BMI (coefficient = 0·673 kg/m(2) , P < 0·001), body fat mass (coefficient = 0·948 kg, P < 0·001) and percentage body fat (coefficient = 0·759%, P < 0·01). An instrumental variable (IV) regression model, using BMI as the intermediate phenotype, suggested that FTO was a strong IV. Also, the FTO-BMI polymorphism was significantly associated with total hip and femoral neck BMD but was not correlated with total spine BMD, with estimated correlation coefficients of 0·0189 (95% CI: 0·0046, 0·0332), 0·0149 (95% CI: 0·0030, 0·0268) and 0·0025 (95% CI: -0·0131, 0·0136) g/cm(2) , respectively. The variances of BMDs explained by the FTO-BMI were 19·0%, 21·3% and 1·1%, respectively. Similar trends were also observed for the FTO-body fat mass and FTO-percentage body fat correlations.
Conclusions:
Mendelian randomization analysis suggests that adiposity might be causally related to BMD at the femur but not at the spine.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
01:24Obesity
01:09Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...
01:40Bone Remodeling
01:17Hormones and Bone Tissue
Hormones That Influence Osteoblasts and/or Maintain the Matrix
Several hormones are necessary for controlling bone growth and maintaining the bone matrix. The pituitary gland secretes growth hormone (GH), which, as its name implies, controls bone growth. This happens in several ways: first, it triggers chondrocyte...