Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy (Retrograde Mastoidectomy) using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
Published on: May 23, 2021
[Correction of auricle deformities after failed otoplasty]
1Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. alexander.berghaus@med.uni-muenchen.de
This study presents a method for correcting deformities that result from failed otoplasty procedures. The authors describe a two-step process involving cartilage edge readaptation and suture-based revision. In cases where cartilage defects are present, porous polyethylene implants are used to restore the auricle's natural shape. The techniques were successfully applied to 16 patients with severe deformities. The authors emphasize the importance of structural reconstruction over superficial fixes like fascia grafts. The outcomes were aesthetically pleasing and durable, with no recurrence of deformities reported.
Area of Science:
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Aesthetic Surgery Techniques
- Otoplasty Outcomes Research
Background:
Otoplasty procedures may lead to undesirable outcomes when aggressive techniques are applied. While prominent ears are a known issue, postoperative deformities can be more bothersome. Prior research has shown that improper cartilage manipulation can cause creases and irregularities. These deformities often require further intervention. Established knowledge includes the use of autogenous cartilage for reconstruction. However, the limitations of using patient-derived cartilage remain unclear. This gap motivated the exploration of alternative materials. The need for effective correction methods remains unmet.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to present a method for correcting deformities resulting from failed otoplasty. The authors sought to evaluate a technique involving cartilage edge readaptation and suture-based revision. They also explored the use of porous polyethylene implants as an alternative to autogenous cartilage. The goal was to improve aesthetic outcomes after previous procedures. The motivation stemmed from the limitations of current camouflage techniques. The authors wanted to address persistent creases and irregularities. They focused on restoring the auricle's natural structure. The approach was designed to avoid the need for repeated surgeries.
Main Methods:
The authors describe a two-step process for correcting auricle deformities. First, cartilage edges are readapted to restore their natural contours. Then, suture techniques are used to reshape the ear. For cases with cartilage defects, porous polyethylene implants are inserted. These implants replace missing cartilage structures. The procedures were applied to 16 patients with severe deformities. Each patient underwent a full revision of the auricle. The surgical approach prioritized structural reconstruction. The authors emphasized avoiding superficial fixes like fascia grafts.
Main Results:
The described techniques successfully corrected deformities in 16 patients. All cases involved severe deformities from prior otoplasty failures. Cartilage edge readaptation reduced visible creases in all patients. Suture techniques restored natural ear contours in 100% of cases. Porous polyethylene implants were used in patients with cartilage defects. These implants provided structural support without donor site complications. The outcomes were aesthetically pleasing and durable. No recurrence of deformities was reported in the follow-up period.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that reconstructing the cartilage framework is essential for successful revision. Suture techniques offer a reliable method for reshaping the auricle. Porous polyethylene implants can replace autogenous cartilage effectively. The approach avoids the need for repeated surgeries or superficial fixes. The results suggest that structural correction improves long-term outcomes. The authors emphasize the importance of addressing deformities at their source. Their findings support the use of porous polyethylene in specific cases. The method described provides a viable alternative to traditional techniques.
Frequently Asked Questions
The techniques successfully corrected deformities in 16 patients, restoring natural ear contours and eliminating creases.
Porous polyethylene implants replaced missing cartilage structures effectively, avoiding donor site complications.
Cartilage edges are readapted to restore natural contours, reducing visible creases caused by previous aggressive techniques.
Suture techniques are used after cartilage edge readaptation to reshape the auricle and restore aesthetic form.
All 16 patients experienced successful correction of deformities with no recurrence reported.
The authors recommend reconstructing the cartilage framework using suture techniques rather than superficial fixes.
Related Concept Videos
Anatomy of the Ear
The Auditory Ossicles
The aptly named stapes look very much like a stirrup. The three ossicles are unique to mammals, and each plays a role in...

