Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy01:37

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been developed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explainable and Subject-Independent VO<sub>2</sub> Estimation Using a Single IMU: A Lightweight Ensemble Framework Under LOSO Validation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Performance benchmarking of deep learning models for real-time median nerve segmentation and cross-sectional area measurement in ultrasound imaging.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Rolling convolution filters for lightweight neural networks in medical image analysis.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same author

ISDU-QSMNet: Iteration Specific Denoising With Unshared Weights for Improved QSM Reconstruction.

NMR in biomedicine·2025
Same author

Unmasking the Hidden Threat: Conductive Under-Deposits and Their Role in Preferential Weldment Corrosion of Carbon Steel under Sour Conditions.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Inference time correction based on confidence and uncertainty for improved deep-learning model performance and explainability in medical image classification.

Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society·2025
Same journal

Segmentation-guided photon pooling enables robust single-cell analysis and fast fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Method of spatial scanning of modulated laser radiation for outline imaging of interphalangeal joints.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Multimodal optical imaging for the assessment of the teratogenic effects of ethanol on zebrafish development.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Fluorescence properties of collagen types I-V: a comprehensive study of spectral and lifetime characteristics.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Spectral dependence of lipofuscin fluorescence lifetimes revealed by FLIM with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
Same journal

Building the future of biophotonics through experiential education and seasonal schools.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging
16:44

Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging

Published on: June 2, 2009

Minimal residual method provides optimal regularization parameter for diffuse optical tomography.

Ravi Prasad K Jagannath1, Phaneendra K Yalavarthy

  • 1Supercomputer Education and Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.

Journal of Biomedical Optics
|October 12, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

An automated method using the regularized minimal residual method (MRM) optimizes regularization parameters for diffuse optical tomography (DOT). This approach improves reconstructed image quality compared to traditional methods.

More Related Videos

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
06:02

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions
13:43

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions

Published on: June 24, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging
16:44

Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging

Published on: June 2, 2009

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
06:02

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions
13:43

Correlative Microscopy for 3D Structural Analysis of Dynamic Interactions

Published on: June 24, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Computational Science

Background:

  • Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) inverse problems are nonlinear and ill-posed.
  • Tikhonov-type regularization is commonly used but parameter selection is empirical.
  • Optimal regularization parameter choice is crucial for image quality in DOT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an automated method for optimal selection of the regularization parameter in DOT.
  • To compare the proposed method with the generalized cross-validation (GCV) method.
  • To evaluate the performance of the regularization parameter selection methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an automated regularization parameter selection method based on the regularized minimal residual method (MRM).
  • Compared MRM-based method with generalized cross-validation (GCV) using numerical and gelatin phantom data.
  • Assessed the quality of reconstructed optical images based on the selected regularization parameters.

Main Results:

  • The MRM-based method successfully identified optimal regularization parameters.
  • MRM demonstrated superior performance in selecting regularization parameters compared to GCV.
  • The proposed method leads to improved reconstructed optical image quality.

Conclusions:

  • The regularized minimal residual method provides an effective automated approach for selecting regularization parameters in DOT.
  • This automated selection enhances the reliability and accuracy of DOT imaging.
  • The MRM-based method is a promising alternative to empirical or traditional parameter selection techniques.