Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Collinearity, tetrachoric correlation, and criterion group assignment of examinees failing only one performance validity test (PVT): Testing Leonhard's (2023) PVT critique.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2025

Same author

Forced choice test score of <i>p</i> ≤ .20 and failures on ≥ six performance validity tests results in similar Overall Test Battery Means.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2023

Same author

Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on test security.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2022

Same author

The rate of psychiatric disorders in veterans undergoing intensive EEG monitoring is associated with symptom and performance invalidity.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2021

Same author

American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2021

Same author

Word-reading ability as a "hold test" in cognitively normal young adults with history of concussion and repetitive head impact exposure: A CARE Consortium Study.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Performance validity and symptom validity in neuropsychological assessment.

Glenn J Larrabee¹

¹glarrabee@aol.com

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS

|October 12, 2012

Summary

Accurate neuropsychological testing requires evaluating performance validity (PVT) and symptom validity (SVT). These methods improve diagnostic accuracy for neurological conditions and minimize false positives, ensuring reliable patient assessments.

More Related Videos

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

Area of Science:

Neuropsychology
Clinical Psychology
Neurology

Background:

Evaluating test performance validity is crucial for accurate neuropsychological assessments.
Inaccurate assessments can lead to misinterpretations of impairment from neurological conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

Introduce and advocate for the terms performance validity (PVT) and symptom validity (SVT).
Replace less descriptive terms like 'effort' or 'response bias'.

Main Methods:

Review existing research on PVTs and SVTs.
Analyze diagnostic discrimination and error minimization strategies.
Examine the impact of multiple independent indicators on diagnostic accuracy.

Main Results:

PVTs and SVTs demonstrate strong diagnostic discrimination.
Atypical performance patterns help minimize false positive errors.
Using multiple indicators reduces false positives and increases the probability of malingering detection.

Conclusions:

PVT and SVT research exhibits high reproducibility and large effect sizes (d ≥ 1.0).
These validity measures exceed the diagnostic power of many psychological and medical procedures.
Rigorous application of PVTs and SVTs enhances the reliability of neuropsychological evaluations.