Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

APACHE II in emergency operations for perforated ulcers.

M Schein1, G Gecelter, Z Freinkel

  • 1Department of Surgery, J.G. Strijdom Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.

American Journal of Surgery
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Masking Artefact Indicates that Photoreceptor Bleaching May Enhance Fundus Autofluorescence.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

Directional OCT Scans of the Macula Reveal Henle Fibre Layer-Related Imaging Patterns.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

Bothersome Cutaneous Lesion for more than 30 Years: Dilated Pore of Winer.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

Long-Term Persistence of Subfoveal Fluid Following Ocriplasmin-Treatment of an FTMH.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

Combined Laser Photocoagulation and anti-VEGF Injection Treatment in Radiation Retinopathy.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017
Same author

Chloroquine Retinopathy under Inadequately Weight Adjusted Dosage: Early Detection by Multimodal Imaging.

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·2017

The APACHE II scoring system accurately predicts risk for patients with perforated peptic ulcers. This tool aids in stratifying surgical risk and guiding future clinical research for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Surgical Critical Care

Background:

  • Perforated peptic ulcers present management challenges due to insufficient severity of illness and operative risk documentation.
  • Standardized tools are needed to assess patient risk in this surgical emergency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the prognostic value of the APACHE II scoring system in patients with perforated peptic ulcers.
  • To assess the APACHE II system as a clinical and research tool for stratifying surgical risk.
  • To examine the system's utility in future studies on perforated peptic ulcer management.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective and prospective evaluation of the APACHE II scoring system.
  • Application of the scoring system to a homogeneous group of patients undergoing emergency operations for perforated ulcers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stratification of patients into risk groups based on preoperative APACHE II scores.

    • Main Results:

    • The APACHE II scoring system demonstrated significant prognostic value in patients with perforated peptic ulcers.
    • Preoperative APACHE II scores accurately stratified patients into distinct surgical risk categories.
    • Analysis of treatment outcomes within APACHE II-stratified subgroups did not reveal superiority of any specific surgical approach.

    Conclusions:

    • The APACHE II scoring system is a valuable tool for assessing prognosis and stratifying surgical risk in patients with perforated peptic ulcers.
    • Its validated prognostic capability supports its use in future clinical trials and research.
    • Current data do not support the superiority of one surgical management strategy over another in patients stratified by APACHE II score.