Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hand hygiene01:23

Hand hygiene

Asepsis is the practice of preventing or breaking the chain of infection. The nurse employs aseptic techniques to prevent the spread of microorganisms and reduce the risk of diseases. Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of aseptic techniques and is classified into medical and surgical asepsis. Medical asepsis includes hand hygiene and the use of gloves. Surgical asepsis, or the sterile technique, refers to practices that render and keep objects and areas free of microorganisms.
Hand washing...
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway01:29

Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway

Nasopharyngeal suctioning is a procedure to remove secretions from the upper part of the respiratory tract that the patient cannot clear independently. It helps maintain airway patency and prevents complications such as aspiration pneumonia.
Equipment Required
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics01:19

Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

Depolarizing blockers are administered through intravenous injection. Succinylcholine is the most common choice of depolarizing blockers in emergency clinical practices. Although they have a rapid onset, they readily diffuse away from the motor end plate into the extracellular fluid. They are metabolized by enzymes such as liver butyrylcholinesterase and plasma pseudocholinesterases. This produces a short duration of action, typically 5-10 minutes long, unlike nondepolarizing blockers, which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conceptual development of a restorative dental prognosis index: A proof-of-concept framework integrating survival evidence and restorability assessment".

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Changes in Workplace Productivity and Estimated Cost Savings During Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Irish National Health Service: Naturalistic, Repeated-Measures, Retrospective Survey Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Ten-year survival of posterior teeth in patients with periodontitis following systematic periodontal treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis using only open-access evidence and analytic tools.

Journal of dentistry·2025
Same author

Machine Learning Model for Response to Internet-Delivered CBT vs Antidepressant Medication.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Banbury Forum Consensus Statement on the Path Forward for Digital Mental Health Treatment.

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)·2025
Same author

Digital mental health treatment implementation playbook: successful practices from implementation experiences in American healthcare organizations.

Frontiers in digital health·2025
Same journal

Is tooth loss associated with subsequent cognitive decline and dementia in ageing populations?

Evidence-based dentistry·2026
Same journal

Do sleep bruxism patients experience higher complication or failure rates with monolithic lithium disilicate or zirconia molar crowns?

Evidence-based dentistry·2026
Same journal

"Spin" in randomized controlled trials of digital implant surgery: a meta-epidemiologic study.

Evidence-based dentistry·2026
Same journal

Maxillary implant-retained overdentures: telescopic versus LOCATOR attachments.

Evidence-based dentistry·2026
Same journal

AI in peer review: the elephant in the editorial room.

Evidence-based dentistry·2026
Same journal

Uncovering the hidden mutational landscape of the oral epithelium.

Evidence-based dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model
04:19

The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model

Published on: January 13, 2023

Does chlorhexidine prevent dry socket?

Derek Richards1

  • 1Centre for Evidence-based Dentistry, Oxford, UK.

Evidence-Based Dentistry
|October 13, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review found limited evidence that chlorhexidine may reduce alveolar osteitis (AO) after third molar removal. However, the evidence is weak, and more high-quality trials are needed to confirm its effectiveness.

More Related Videos

A Mice Model of Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Induced Peritoneal Damage
04:25

A Mice Model of Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Induced Peritoneal Damage

Published on: April 28, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model
04:19

The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model

Published on: January 13, 2023

A Mice Model of Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Induced Peritoneal Damage
04:25

A Mice Model of Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Induced Peritoneal Damage

Published on: April 28, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Evidence-Based Dentistry
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Alveolar osteitis (AO), or dry socket, is a common complication following tooth extraction, particularly third molar removal.
  • Preventive strategies aim to reduce AO incidence and associated patient morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the evidence on the efficacy of chlorhexidine in preventing alveolar osteitis.
  • To assess the quality of existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, etc.).
  • Included were prospective, two-arm (or more) clinical studies evaluating AO incidence.
  • Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, with meta-analysis for homogeneous data.

Main Results:

  • Ten RCTs were included, mostly involving third molar extraction.
  • Only two of six evaluated chlorhexidine application protocols (0.2% gel or 0.12% rinse) showed a significant decrease in AO incidence compared to placebo.
  • Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's regression.

Conclusions:

  • The current evidence supporting chlorhexidine for AO prevention is weak due to high risk of bias in included studies.
  • While chlorhexidine did not show significantly higher adverse reactions than placebo, its effectiveness remains uncertain.
  • High-quality RCTs are necessary to establish conclusive evidence on chlorhexidine's role in AO prevention.