Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals01:16

Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals

Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For instance, consider...
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
Radical Reactivity: Overview01:11

Radical Reactivity: Overview

Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired molecule. These three...
Properties of Organometallic Compounds01:23

Properties of Organometallic Compounds

Organometallic compounds are compounds that contain a carbon–metal bond. Carbon belongs to an organyl group like alkyl, aryl, allyl, or benzyl groups. The metal can be from Group I or Group II of the periodic table, a transition metal, or a semimetal.
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
Fast Reactions01:27

Fast Reactions

Fast reactions occurring in times shorter than the time needed to mix reactants pose a unique challenge for investigation. In a liquid-phase continuous-flow system, reactants A and B are swiftly pushed into the mixing chamber, where mixing occurs within 1 ms. The reaction mixture then flows through an observation tube, and one measures light absorption to determine species concentrations at various points of the tube. This method is most appropriate when relatively large volumes of reactants...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LIDDIA: Language-based Intelligent Drug Discovery Agent.

Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing·2026
Same author

Effects of DPTQ, a novel positive allosteric modulator of the dopamine D1 receptor, on spontaneous eye blink rate and spatial working memory in the nonhuman primate.

Psychopharmacology·2023
Same author

Editorial: Risk assessment of mycotoxins in food.

Frontiers in nutrition·2023
Same author

Mutual Cooperativity of Three Allosteric Sites on the Dopamine D1 Receptor.

Molecular pharmacology·2023
Same author

Context Aware Data-Driven Retrosynthetic Analysis.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2020
Same author

Synthesis and Pharmacological Characterization of 2-(2,6-Dichlorophenyl)-1-((1<i>S</i>,3<i>R</i>)-5-(3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyl)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-1-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-2(1<i>H</i>)-yl)ethan-1-one (LY3154207), a Potent, Subtype Selective, and Orally Available Positive Allosteric Modulator of the Human Dopamine D1 Receptor.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2019
Same journal

Charting New Territory: Systematic Evaluation of the Drug Potential of <i>N</i>-Trifluoromethyl Amides, Ureas & Carbamates.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same journal

Red-Light-Triggered <i>In Vitro</i> and <i>In Vivo</i> Photocatalytic Cancer Therapy with Polypyridyl Os(II) Photocatalysts.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same journal

Novel Selenium-Containing Small Molecule PD-L1 Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of the Antitumor Activity.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same journal

HsClpP-Engaging Selective Mitochondrial Pan-PDK Degraders for Cancer Therapy.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same journal

Rational Development of Activatable Prodrugs of the GSTP1 Inhibitor NBDHEX: Turn-On NIR Fluorogenic Drug Delivery with Selective Anticancer Activity.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same journal

Recent Highlights in the Discovery and Design of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

Rules for identifying potentially reactive or promiscuous compounds.

Robert F Bruns1, Ian A Watson

  • 1Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA. bruns_robert_f@lilly.com

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
|October 16, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed 275 rules to identify and remove interfering compounds from biological screening sets, improving data reliability. A biological promiscuity index and nuisance list further refine compound selection for drug discovery.

More Related Videos

Applying Cheminformatics to Develop a Structure Searchable Database of Analytical Methods
05:34

Applying Cheminformatics to Develop a Structure Searchable Database of Analytical Methods

Published on: June 6, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

Applying Cheminformatics to Develop a Structure Searchable Database of Analytical Methods
05:34

Applying Cheminformatics to Develop a Structure Searchable Database of Analytical Methods

Published on: June 6, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medicinal Chemistry
  • Assay Development
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Biological assays are crucial for drug discovery but can be confounded by interfering compounds.
  • Identifying and removing these problematic compounds is essential for reliable screening data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a comprehensive set of rules and methods for identifying and removing compounds that interfere with biological assays.
  • To improve the quality and reliability of compound screening data in drug discovery programs.

Main Methods:

  • Development of 275 structural rules to flag reactive, interfering, unstable, or non-druggable compounds.
  • Creation of a biological promiscuity index based on the number of gene subfamilies a compound affects.
  • Establishment of a 'nuisance list' to identify interfering compounds not caught by substructure rules, often due to occult contaminants.

Main Results:

  • A robust set of 275 rules was established over 18 years, validated by medicinal chemists.
  • The biological promiscuity index effectively flagged compounds with broad, potentially artefactual activity.
  • The nuisance list successfully identified interfering compounds missed by substructure analysis, highlighting the issue of occult contaminants.

Conclusions:

  • The developed rules and associated methods significantly enhance the ability to identify and remove problematic compounds from screening libraries.
  • These strategies improve the accuracy of biological assay results and streamline the drug discovery process.
  • Addressing both structural and contaminant-based interference is critical for robust compound profiling.