Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validity and reliability of digital occlusal analyzing methods in Dentistry. A systematic review.

Journal of dentistry·2025
Same author

Prognosis of Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Five-Year Prospective Clinical Study.

Clinical oral implants research·2024
Same author

SURVIVAL RATE OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED, SINGLE-TOOTH RESTORATIONS BASED ON ZIRCONIA OR METAL ABUTMENT IN PATIENTS WITH TOOTH AGENESIS: A 5-YEARS PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice·2024
Same author

Survival and Success of Dental Implants in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases: a Systematic Review.

Journal of oral & maxillofacial research·2024
Same author

Resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis versus implant-supported single crowns in the anterior region.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2023
Same author

Patient-reported outcomes for bone regenerative procedures.

Periodontology 2000·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Consensus report - reconstructions on implants. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012.

Klaus Gotfredsen1, Anselm Wiskott,

  • 1Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. klg@sund.ku.dk

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|October 16, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review synthesizes current knowledge on dental implant reconstructions, focusing on connections, fixation methods (cement vs. screw-retained), and optimal implant numbers for prostheses and overdentures.

More Related Videos

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Biomaterials

Background:

  • Review of current knowledge on implant connections, fixation methods, and optimal implant numbers for dental prostheses and overdentures.
  • Systematic literature search and critical review conducted to update existing knowledge in these areas.

Framework:

  • Four systematic reviews formed the basis for consensus statements and clinical recommendations.
  • Position papers addressed internal vs. external connections, cemented vs. screw-retained reconstructions, and optimal implant numbers for fixed and removable prostheses.

Implementation:

  • Consensus statements and clinical recommendations were formulated based on the systematic reviews.
  • Implications for future research were identified in the areas of implant connections, fixation, and prosthetic design.

Implications:

  • Provides evidence-based guidance for clinicians regarding implant reconstruction choices.
  • Highlights areas requiring further research to optimize long-term outcomes in implant dentistry.