Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Improving organizational climate for quality and quality of care: does membership in a collaborative help?
Ingrid M Nembhard1, Veronika Northrup, Dale Shaller
1Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA. ingrid.nembhard@yale.edu
Background:
The lack of quality-oriented organizational climates is partly responsible for deficiencies in patient-centered care and poor quality more broadly. To improve their quality-oriented climates, several organizations have joined quality improvement collaboratives. The effectiveness of this approach is unknown.
Objective:
To evaluate the impact of collaborative membership on organizational climate for quality and service quality.
Subjects:
Twenty-one clinics, 4 of which participated in a collaborative sponsored by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement.
Research Design:
Pre-post design. Preassessments occurred 2 months before the collaborative began in January 2009. Postassessments of service quality and climate occurred about 6 months and 1 year, respectively, after the collaborative ended in January 2010. We surveyed clinic employees (eg, physicians, nurses, receptionists, etc.) about the organizational climate and patients about service quality.
Measures:
Prioritization of quality care, high-quality staff relationships, and open communication as indicators of quality-oriented climate and timeliness of care, staff helpfulness, doctor-patient communication, rating of doctor, and willingness to recommend doctor's office as indicators of service quality.
Results:
There was no significant effect of collaborative membership on quality-oriented climate and mixed effects on service quality. Doctors' ratings improved significantly more in intervention clinics than in control clinics, staff helpfulness improved less, and timeliness of care declined more. Ratings of doctor-patient communication and willingness to recommend doctor were not significantly different between intervention and comparison clinics.
Conclusion:
Membership in the collaborative provided no significant advantage for improving quality-oriented climate and had equivocal effects on service quality.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Obedience
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and patients...
Patient-centered Care