Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test01:19

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of interest.
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models01:17

Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models

Clearance is a pharmacokinetic parameter traditionally defined by compartment models, signifying the rate at which a drug is expelled from the body. However, a noncompartmental model offers an alternative method for assessing clearance, primarily employing empirical data obtained after administering a single drug dose.
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High protective efficacy of a recombinant Fer2 vaccine against Dermacentor marginatus infestations.

Experimental & applied acarology·2026
Same author

Anomalous Saturation of CO Adsorption at 26% on Cu(111) Governed by Nanometer-Scale Substrate-Mediated Interactions.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025
Same author

Opportunities and challenges of diffusion models for generative AI.

National science review·2024
Same author

Are Latent Factor Regression and Sparse Regression Adequate?

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2024
Same author

Understanding Implicit Regularization in Over-Parameterized Single Index Model.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2024
Same author

Communication-Efficient Accurate Statistical Estimation.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

REGULARIZATION FOR COX'S PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL WITH NP-DIMENSIONALITY.

Jelena Bradic1, Jianqing Fan, Jiancheng Jiang

  • 1University of California, San Diego.

Annals of Statistics
|October 16, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Non-concave penalized methods improve model selection for high-dimensional genetic data with censored clinical information. These methods achieve oracle properties, enhancing accuracy in Cox

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • High-throughput genetic sequencing generates vast data with numerous measurements and censored clinical information.
  • This necessitates advanced model selection techniques for accurate analysis.
  • Existing methods struggle with the complexity of non-polynomial (NP) dimensional data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish strong oracle properties for non-concave penalized methods in Cox's proportional hazards model.
  • To investigate model selection consistency under dimensionality and correlation restrictions.
  • To develop an efficient algorithm for penalized hazard regression.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing folded-concave penalties, including LASSO and SCAD.
  • Applying large deviation results for martingales to characterize oracle properties.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

  • Developing a coordinate-wise algorithm for penalized hazard regression.
  • Main Results:

    • Demonstrating that non-concave penalties reduce the 'irrepresentable condition' for LASSO consistency.
    • Showing that non-concave regularized estimators asymptotically achieve the oracle estimator's information bound.
    • Validating the algorithm's performance on simulated and gene association studies.

    Conclusions:

    • Non-concave penalized methods offer robust model selection for high-dimensional genetic data with censoring.
    • These methods provide theoretical guarantees and practical performance improvements.
    • The developed algorithm efficiently handles penalized hazard regression problems.