Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology01:25

Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology

Early Ischemia and Ionic ImbalanceWithin minutes of spinal cord injury, a secondary cascade begins, progressing over hours to weeks. Vascular damage reduces blood flow, causing ischemia and mitochondrial dysfunction. ATP depletion leads to ion pump failure, membrane depolarization, sodium influx, potassium efflux, and water accumulation, resulting in cellular swelling. Increased intracellular calcium further disrupts mitochondria and accelerates cellular injury.Excitotoxicity and Neuronal...
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology01:14

Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology

Spinal cord injury progresses through two interconnected phases: primary injury and secondary injury.Primary InjuryPrimary injury happens at the moment of trauma and involves immediate mechanical damage to the spinal cord.Compression happens when broken vertebrae, herniated discs, or accumulating blood (such as a hematoma) press directly against the spinal cord, distorting its normal shape and function. In cases of contusion, the cord is bruised by a blunt force (like penetrating injuries or...
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reevaluating the classification of pediatric speech sound disorders: a ground truthing perspective.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025
Same author

Two-Year Longitudinal Motor Performance of Very Preterm and/or Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants in Suriname.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Upper limb training for young children with unilateral cerebral palsy using video coaching: An explorative retrospective clinical study.

Australian occupational therapy journal·2025
Same author

Digital game-based learning for dynamic assessment and early intervention targeting reading difficulties: Cross-linguistic studies of GraphoLearn.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2025
Same author

Preface to the Special Issue: Select Papers From the 8th International Conference on Speech Motor Control.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024
Same author

Implementing the Effective Coach2Move Approach for Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mobility Limitations in Physical Therapist Practice: A Multi-Methods Process Evaluation.

Physical therapy·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
07:20

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Published on: August 9, 2024

Motor sequence learning in children with spina bifida.

Anja Vinck1, Ben A M Maassen, Wouter Hulstijn

  • 1Department of Medical Psychology/Pediatric Neurology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. a.vinck@mps.umcn.nl

Developmental Neuropsychology
|October 17, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Children with spina bifida (SB) and cerebral malformations (SBM) show normal motor sequence learning, but impaired motor performance. Cerebellar malformations may influence outcomes in SB patients.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
10:02

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy

Published on: November 3, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
07:20

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Published on: August 9, 2024

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
10:02

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy

Published on: November 3, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Pediatrics
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Spina bifida (SB) is a congenital condition often associated with cognitive and motor deficits.
  • Cerebral malformations (SBM) in SB patients can exacerbate neurological impairments.
  • The impact of SB and SBM on motor learning remains incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate motor sequence learning abilities in children with spina bifida.
  • To compare motor learning in children with SB and those with SB and cerebral malformations (SBM).
  • To assess the influence of cerebellar malformations on motor learning in SB.

Main Methods:

  • Neuropsychological assessments were administered to all participants.
  • A drawing task was used to evaluate fine motor skills.
  • A spatial motor sequence learning task measured implicit motor learning and performance.

Main Results:

  • Children with SB and SBM demonstrated intact implicit motor learning, comparable to healthy controls.
  • Sequence learning ability was similar across SB, SBM, and control groups.
  • Both SB and SBM groups exhibited significant impairments in overall motor performance.

Conclusions:

  • Motor sequence learning is preserved in children with spina bifida, irrespective of cerebral malformations.
  • Impaired motor performance in SB/SBM suggests deficits beyond sequence learning, potentially related to cerebellar involvement.
  • Further research is needed to elucidate the specific role of cerebellar malformations in SB motor deficits.