Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Semi-Automatic Graphical Tool for Measuring Coronary Artery Spatially Weighted Calcium Score from Gated Cardiac Computed Tomography Images
Published on: September 22, 2023
Coronary angiographic scoring systems: an evaluation of their equivalence and validity
Ian J Neeland1, Riyaz S Patel, Parham Eshtehardi
1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Insights
Coronary artery disease scoring systems correlate well with each other and with plaque burden. Angiographic scores provide a valid estimate of coronary artery disease severity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Multiple scoring systems exist to quantify coronary artery disease (CAD) burden from angiography.
- The relationship between these scores and their accuracy in reflecting actual plaque burden is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare commonly used angiographic scoring systems against each other.
- To assess the correlation of these angiographic scores with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived plaque burden.
Main Methods:
- Scored coronary angiographic data from 3600 patients using 10 different systems.
- Quantified plaque burden and area in a subset of 50 patients using IVUS in the left anterior descending artery.
Main Results:
- All 10 angiographic scoring systems showed strong intercorrelations (Spearman's ρ, 0.79-0.98).
- All systems correlated significantly with IVUS-measured plaque burden (ρ, 0.56-0.78) and plaque area (ρ, 0.43-0.62).
- The CASS-50 score demonstrated the strongest correlation with plaque burden and area.
Conclusions:
- Angiographic scoring systems are highly correlated with each other.
- These scoring systems serve as a valid estimation of atherosclerotic plaque burden in coronary artery disease.
Background:
Multiple scoring systems have been devised to quantify angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) burden, but it is unclear how these scores relate to each other and which scores are most accurate. The aim of this study was to compare coronary angiographic scoring systems (1) with each other and (2) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived plaque burden in a population undergoing angiographic evaluation for CAD.
Methods:
Coronary angiographic data from 3600 patients were scored using 10 commonly used angiographic scoring systems and interscore correlations were calculated. In a subset of 50 patients, plaque burden and plaque area in the left anterior descending coronary artery were quantified using IVUS and correlated with angiographic scores.
Results:
All angiographic scores correlated with each other (range for Spearman coefficient [ρ] 0.79-0.98, P < .0001); the 2 most widely used scores, Gensini and CASS-70, had a ρ = 0.90 (P < .0001). All scores correlated significantly with average plaque burden and plaque area by IVUS (range ρ 0.56-0.78, P < .0001 and 0.43-0.62, P < .01, respectively). The CASS-50 score had the strongest correlation (ρ 0.78 and 0.62, P < .0001) and the Duke Jeopardy score the weakest correlation (ρ 0.56 and 0.43, P < .01) with plaque burden and area, respectively.
Conclusions:
Angiographic scoring systems are strongly correlated with each other and with atherosclerotic plaque burden. Scoring systems therefore appear to be a valid estimate of CAD plaque burden.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment

