Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Determination of prevalence and risk factors of childhood malnutrition in Ilorin South, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Analysis and evaluation of educational supervision practices in Gambian schools.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Methods for evaluating educational programs: does Writing Center participation affect student achievement?

Julia Bredtmann1, Carsten J Crede, Sebastian Otten

  • 1Department of Economics, Ruhr University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany. ;julia.bredtmann@rwi-essen.de

Evaluation and Program Planning
|October 17, 2012
PubMed
Summary

A university

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Higher Education
  • Educational Program Evaluation
  • Scientific Writing Pedagogy

Background:

  • Universities often implement writing centers to enhance students' scientific writing skills.
  • Student feedback surveys are commonly used to assess educational program effectiveness.
  • However, the reliability of student feedback alone for program evaluation is often questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the actual effectiveness of a university's Writing Center in improving students' scientific writing outcomes.
  • To compare objective learning outcomes with subjective student feedback for program assessment.
  • To apply statistical methods from labor market treatment evaluation to educational program assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized students' actual learning outcomes as the primary quality measure, moving beyond subjective feedback.
  • Applied statistical evaluation methods commonly used in labor market treatment literature.
  • Compared results from objective measures with those derived from student feedback surveys.

Main Results:

  • Despite positive student self-reported feedback on writing courses, no significant impact on academic grades was detected.
  • Objective learning outcome measures did not corroborate the positive sentiment from student surveys.
  • Statistical analysis revealed no significant causal effect of Writing Center participation on student academic performance.

Conclusions:

  • Institutions should not solely rely on student course evaluations for evidence-based policy decisions.
  • Objective measures of student learning outcomes are crucial for a valid assessment of educational programs.
  • Further research is needed to refine methods for evaluating the impact of academic support services.