Predicting the outcome of infectious diseases: variability among inbred mice as a new and powerful tool for biomarker

Miriam E Martin1, Jacquelyn A Dieter, Zheng Luo

  • 1The Center for Comparative Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA.

Mbio
|October 18, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Variability in Helicobacter pylori infection in mice unexpectedly correlated with influenza outcomes. This suggests a biological basis for disease susceptibility, not just random chance or errors.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Individual responses to infectious diseases vary, even in genetically identical populations.
  • This variability is often attributed to experimental error or random chance.
  • Understanding disease susceptibility in genetically similar individuals is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the source of variability in Helicobacter pylori colonization density in C57BL/6J mice.
  • To determine if this variability correlates with responses to other infections, such as influenza.
  • To explore the potential of inbred mice as models for identifying disease susceptibility biomarkers.

Main Methods:

  • Experimentally infected C57BL/6J mice with Helicobacter pylori.
  • Challenged infected mice with influenza virus.
  • Measured Helicobacter pylori colonization density, mouse weight loss, and influenza viral load.

Main Results:

  • Variability in H. pylori colonization density strongly correlated with weight loss and viral load after influenza challenge.
  • H. pylori infection did not affect influenza infection, and vice versa.
  • The correlation persisted despite the pathogens residing in different tissues and being detected by unrelated methods.

Conclusions:

  • The observed correlation suggests a biological basis for disease susceptibility in genetically similar individuals.
  • Inbred mice can serve as a valuable model for discovering biomarkers that predict infectious disease outcomes.
  • This finding challenges the assumption that variability in controlled experiments is solely due to technical or stochastic factors.