Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
The risk stratification in atrial fibrillation
Domenico Prisco1, Caterina Cenci, Elena Silvestri
1Department of Medical and Surgical Critical Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. priscod@aou-careggi.toscana.it
Insights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) stroke risk stratification models like CHADS(2) have limitations. Newer scores, CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc, and biomarkers improve risk assessment for antithrombotic therapy in AF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Thrombosis Research
- Public Health
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia linked to increased stroke risk.
- Accurate stroke risk stratification is crucial for effective antithrombotic therapy.
- Existing models like CHADS(2) have limitations in identifying all stroke risk factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evolution and limitations of stroke risk stratification models in AF.
- To highlight newer models and biomarkers for improved thromboembolic risk assessment.
- To emphasize the importance of balancing thromboembolic and bleeding risks.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing stroke risk stratification models for AF.
- Discussion of novel biomarkers and risk factors for ischemic complications.
- Inclusion of bleeding risk assessment tools.
Main Results:
- The CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score outperforms the CHADS(2) score in predicting stroke risk.
- Biomarkers (e.g., C-reactive protein, interleukin-6) and genetic factors (e.g., Factor II gene polymorphism) are associated with increased risk.
- Chronic kidney disease and AF burden also contribute to stroke risk.
- The HAS-BLED score aids in assessing bleeding risk.
Conclusions:
- Risk stratification in AF requires moving beyond traditional models.
- Integrating novel biomarkers and clinical factors enhances thromboembolic risk assessment.
- Simultaneous evaluation of bleeding risk is essential for personalized antithrombotic strategies.
Abstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common rhythm disorder and represents a major public health problem because it carries an increased risk of arterial thromboembolism and ischemic stroke. Because the absolute benefit of antithrombotic therapy depends on the underlying risk of stroke, an accurate stratification of patients' risk is needed to choose the appropriate antithrombotic strategy. Over the years, several stroke risk stratification models (RSMs) were developed based on the 'classic' risk factors for stroke such as increasing age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and left ventricular dysfunction. Among all RSMs, the CHADS(2) score is the most popular and used one thanks to its simplicity and endorsement in several widely promulgated practice guidelines. Despite its validation in large datasets and specific population of AF patients, it has many limitations, especially due to the non-inclusion of several proven risk factors for stroke and to the classification of a large number of patients in the intermediate risk category, so creating ambiguity over the most appropriate antithrombotic therapy. Thus, the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was introduced and was demonstrated to perform better than the CHADS(2), even in a "real world" population of elderly AF patients. Recently, in view of the availability of new oral anticoagulant drugs, that can overcome the limitations of warfarin and allow a more personalized therapy, many efforts are being made to identify other possibilities to assess the thromboembolic risk in AF patients. It has been demonstrated that an increase in C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 and the presence of G20210A factor II gene polymorphism and hyper-homocysteinemia are independent risk factors for ischemic complications in AF patients. Even the presence of chronic renal disease and the daily AF burden, registered with implantable monitors, are associated with an increase risk of stroke. Finally, the assessment of thromboembolic risk should go hand in hand with the consideration of the risk of bleeding. For this purpose, it has been recently developed a practical bleeding risk score, the HAS-BLED, which was included in the last ESC guidelines for the risk stratification of AF patients before starting anticoagulant therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias II: Classification of Tachyarrhythmias

